Suppr超能文献

A comparison of 5-fluorouridine and 5-fluorouracil in an experimental model for the treatment of vitreoretinal scarring.

作者信息

Ward T, Hartzer M, Blumenkranz M, Lin L R

机构信息

Beaumont Eye Institute, Royal Oak, Michigan.

出版信息

Curr Eye Res. 1993 May;12(5):397-401. doi: 10.3109/02713689309024621.

Abstract

5-Fluorouridine (5-FUR), a ribonucleotide metabolite of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), is a more potent inhibitor of cellular proliferation and cell-mediated contraction in vitro than 5-FU. We compared the efficacy of these two drugs in a cell injection model of proliferative vitreoretinopathy using New Zealand albino rabbits. Forty-five eyes were divided into three groups and injected intravitreally with homologous fibroblasts. Eyes were examined at the time of injection and 7, 14, 21 and 28 days thereafter. By day 28, 70.5% (12 of 17) of 5-FUR treated eyes demonstrated no appreciable proliferative or tractional activity compared with 41.7% (5 of 12) of 5-FU treated eyes and 10% (1 of 10) of control eyes (p < 0.006). Medullary ray puckers developed in 29.4% (5 of 17) and 25% (3 of 12) of 5-FUR and 5-FU treated eyes respectively. No 5-FUR treated eye developed extensive tractional or combined tractional and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment compared with 33.3% (4 of 12) of 5-FU treated eyes and 80% (8 of 10) of control eyes (p < 0.001). These results suggest that 5-Fluorouridine may be more effective than 5-FU for the treatment of vitreoretinal scarring.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验