Visscher D W, Sarkar F, LoRusso P, Sakr W, Ottosen S, Wykes S, Crissman J D
Department of Pathology, Harper Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Mod Pathol. 1993 May;6(3):302-6.
Immunostaining of two invasion-associated proteolytic enzymes, cathepsin D (CD) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), was assessed in cryostat sections of 86 stage-heterogeneous breast carcinomas using monoclonal antibodies. Most tumors displayed a focal and/or heterogeneous staining pattern. Overall, staining was more frequent in host-derived stromal and inflammatory cells (uPA 54%, CD 89%) than neoplastic epithelium per se (uPA 24%, CD 70%). Intense (i.e., 2+) stromal, but not neoplastic, CD was significantly correlated with nodal or systematic metastases (node negative--10% versus node positive/systemic--33%, p = 0.04). Further, cumulative staining of more than one enzyme (CD + uPA) or more than one tumor component (stroma + epithelium) correlated with metastatic disease (no metastases--35% versus metastatic--72%, p = 0.005). Neither stromal nor epithelial CD alone was significantly correlated with short-term recurrence free survival, however additive CD staining (i.e., stromal + epithelial) was strongly predictive, overall (both + -75% recurred versus both weak/negative--16% recurred, p = 0.0004) and in node positive patients (p = 0.02). We conclude that (a) enzymes putatively mediating extracellular matrix dissolution may be derived from multiple sources and (b) the metastatic capacity and/or clinical aggressiveness of breast carcinomas may reflect overall proteolytic enzyme expression, suggesting that cooperative enzyme interaction may be required for invasive growth and/or metastasis.
使用单克隆抗体,对86例不同分期的乳腺癌冷冻切片中两种与侵袭相关的蛋白水解酶——组织蛋白酶D(CD)和尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂(uPA)进行免疫染色评估。大多数肿瘤呈现局灶性和/或异质性染色模式。总体而言,宿主来源的基质和炎症细胞中的染色(uPA为54%,CD为89%)比肿瘤上皮本身更为常见(uPA为24%,CD为70%)。强烈的(即2+)基质CD染色(而非肿瘤性CD染色)与淋巴结或远处转移显著相关(淋巴结阴性——10%,而淋巴结阳性/远处转移——33%,p = 0.04)。此外,一种以上酶(CD + uPA)或一种以上肿瘤成分(基质 + 上皮)的累积染色与转移性疾病相关(无转移——35%,而转移——72%,p = 0.005)。单独的基质或上皮CD染色与短期无复发生存均无显著相关性,然而,总的来说(两者均强阳性——75%复发,而两者均弱阳性/阴性——16%复发,p = 0.0004)以及在淋巴结阳性患者中(p = 0.02),累加的CD染色(即基质 + 上皮)具有很强的预测性。我们得出结论:(a)可能介导细胞外基质溶解的酶可能来自多种来源;(b)乳腺癌的转移能力和/或临床侵袭性可能反映了总的蛋白水解酶表达,这表明侵袭性生长和/或转移可能需要酶的协同相互作用。