Kehoe R F, MacNeil D J, Zheutlin T A, Ezri M D, Nazari J, Spangenberg R B, Dunnington C, Lueken M
Department of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology, Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60657.
Am J Cardiol. 1993 Aug 12;72(4):56A-66A. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90026-9.
The safety and efficacy of oral sotalol were evaluated in 481 patients with drug-refractory sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) in an open-label multicenter study. After drug-free baseline evaluations, therapy was initiated at 80 mg every 12 hours, with upward dose titrations of 160 mg/day being allowed at intervals of 72 hours to a maximum dose of 480 mg every 12 hours. Efficacy determinations were made by either programmed electrical stimulation (PES) or Holter monitoring responses. Of the 481 patients enrolled, 473 underwent acute-phase titration. Of the 269 patients assessable by PES, 94 (34.9%) exhibited complete response (suppression of inducible VT), with an additional 67 patients (24.9%) exhibiting partial response. Of the 109 patients assessable by Holter monitoring, 43 (39.4%) exhibited a complete response. There were no significant differences between responders and nonresponders with regard to left ventricular ejection fraction. Although response rates tended to improve as the sotalol dose was increased to 640 mg/day, efficacy was most commonly achieved at a sotalol dose of 320 mg/day. Sotalol was discontinued because of adverse effects in 42 (8.9%) of the acute-phase patients. The most common adverse effect was proarrhythmia, which was observed in 23 patients (4.9%). Proarrhythmia took the form of torsades de pointes in 12 patients and an increase in VT episodes in 11. In 3 acute-phase patients (0.6%), sotalol was discontinued because of the emergence of congestive heart failure. A total of 286 patients entered the long-term phase. Life-table estimates of the proportion of patients who remained free of recurrence of arrhythmia at 12, 18, and 27 months were 0.76, 0.72, and 0.66, respectively. There were no significant differences in time to recurrence of arrhythmia as related to PES response, Holter monitor response, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, or history of congestive heart failure. Among the 70 patients (24.5%) in whom there was recurrence of arrhythmia, sudden death occurred in 17 and sustained VT in 41. Sotalol was discontinued owing to presumed adverse effects in 21 (7.3%) of the long-term patients, including 8 with proarrhythmia; proarrhythmia consisted of torsades de pointes in 3 patients and increased episodes of VT in 5. These findings suggest that sotalol is an effective drug for the long-term treatment of patients with drug-refractory sustained VT. Proarrhythmia was observed in only 6.4% of the study population and tended to occur during the acute titration phase. The need to discontinue therapy because of congestive heart failure was uncommon.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在一项开放标签的多中心研究中,对481例药物难治性持续性室性心律失常(VT)患者评估了口服索他洛尔的安全性和有效性。在进行无药物基线评估后,开始每12小时服用80毫克进行治疗,允许每隔72小时向上滴定剂量160毫克/天,最大剂量为每12小时480毫克。通过程控电刺激(PES)或动态心电图监测反应来确定疗效。在纳入的481例患者中,473例进行了急性期滴定。在269例可通过PES评估的患者中,94例(34.9%)表现出完全反应(可诱发VT受到抑制),另有67例患者(24.9%)表现出部分反应。在109例可通过动态心电图监测评估的患者中,43例(39.4%)表现出完全反应。在左心室射血分数方面,反应者和无反应者之间没有显著差异。尽管随着索他洛尔剂量增加至640毫克/天,反应率有改善趋势,但疗效最常出现在索他洛尔剂量为320毫克/天的时候。42例(8.9%)急性期患者因不良反应停用索他洛尔。最常见的不良反应是心律失常,23例患者(4.9%)出现该不良反应。心律失常表现为12例患者出现尖端扭转型室速,11例患者室速发作增加。3例急性期患者(0.6%)因出现充血性心力衰竭停用索他洛尔。共有286例患者进入长期阶段。在12、18和27个月时仍无心律失常复发的患者比例的生存表估计分别为0.76、0.72和0.66。在心律失常复发时间方面,与PES反应、动态心电图监测反应、基线左心室射血分数或充血性心力衰竭病史无关,无显著差异。在70例(24.5%)出现心律失常复发的患者中,17例发生猝死,41例发生持续性室速。21例(7.3%)长期患者因推测的不良反应停用索他洛尔,其中8例出现心律失常;心律失常包括3例患者出现尖端扭转型室速,5例患者室速发作增加。这些发现表明,索他洛尔是治疗药物难治性持续性室速患者的有效药物。在仅6.4%的研究人群中观察到心律失常,且倾向于在急性滴定阶段发生。因充血性心力衰竭而停药的情况并不常见。(摘要截短至400字)