Nicholls G, Upadhyaya V, Gornall P, Buick R G, Corkery J J
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Ladywood.
Arch Dis Child. 1993 Jul;69(1 Spec No):71-2. doi: 10.1136/adc.69.1_spec_no.71.
This study aims to establish the usefulness of delivering neonates with gastroschisis in a regional obstetric and neonatal centre without the facility of on site surgery. A retrospective analysis was performed on the notes of 43 consecutive neonates with gastroschisis referred to Birmingham Children's Hospital over a 10 year period. Two groups were compared: those delivered at the regional obstetric centre (n = 9) and those delivered peripherally (n = 34). Both groups underwent postnatal transfer. There were no significant differences with regard to gestational age, birth weight, caesarean section rate, time to operation, and mortality. Primary closure rates were 89% for the regional centre group and 94% for the peripheral hospital group. Mean time to full enteral feeding was 24 days for the regional centre group and 23 days for those delivered peripherally. These data show that good results can be achieved with postnatal transfer. If on site surgery is not available, neonatal services are adequate peripherally, and the transfer distance is not too great, then delivery in a regional obstetric centre with subsequent postnatal transfer offers no advantage.
本研究旨在确定在没有现场手术设施的地区产科和新生儿中心分娩患有腹裂的新生儿的可行性。对10年间转诊至伯明翰儿童医院的43例连续性腹裂新生儿病历进行了回顾性分析。比较了两组:在地区产科中心分娩的新生儿(n = 9)和在周边地区分娩的新生儿(n = 34)。两组均在产后进行转运。在胎龄、出生体重、剖宫产率、手术时间和死亡率方面无显著差异。地区中心组的一期缝合率为89%,周边医院组为94%。地区中心组完全肠内喂养的平均时间为24天,周边地区分娩的新生儿为23天。这些数据表明,产后转运可取得良好效果。如果没有现场手术,周边地区的新生儿服务充足,且转运距离不太远,那么在地区产科中心分娩并随后进行产后转运并无优势。