• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Autotraction versus passive traction: an open controlled study in lumbar disc herniation.

作者信息

Tesio L, Merlo A

机构信息

Servizio di Riabilitazione, Istituto Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Aug;74(8):871-6. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90015-3.

DOI:10.1016/0003-9993(93)90015-3
PMID:8347073
Abstract

Autotraction (AT) is a treatment for low-back pain syndrome of benign etiology that uses a specially designed traction table divided into two movable sections. While lying on the table, the pelvis secured, the patient controls the traction forces by grasping and pulling the bars at the head of the table. There are controls for the therapist to apply, through movable sections of the table, rotation and bending forces to help restore mobility to the lumbar spine without inducing pain. The present study is based upon a randomized treatment trial comparing conventional passive traction (PT) to AT. The following outcome indicators were used: (1) subjective response concerning overall improvement, (2) pain intensity (visual analog scale, 0-100), (3) qualitative pain severity (McGill Pain Questionnaire, short-form, 0-45), and (4) pain related disability (Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Score, 0-100). The favorable response to AT was 75% (30 of the 40 patients) versus the 22% (6 of 27 patients) to PT (p < 0.001). After 3 months, 19 of the 30 responders to AT (63%) reported continued improvement. In these patients, pain ratings remained stable and the disability scores decreased to 0 to 23% of the pretreatment value (median and mean respectively, p < 0.001).

摘要

相似文献

1
Autotraction versus passive traction: an open controlled study in lumbar disc herniation.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Aug;74(8):871-6. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90015-3.
2
Autotraction in lumbar disc herniation. A myelographic study before and after treatment.腰椎间盘突出症的自动牵引。治疗前后的脊髓造影研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1985;104(4):207-10. doi: 10.1007/BF00450211.
3
Natchev's auto-traction for lumbago-sciatica: effectiveness in lumbar disc herniation.纳切夫氏腰腿痛-坐骨神经痛自动牵引法:对腰椎间盘突出症的疗效
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 Nov;70(12):831-4.
4
Inversion therapy in patients with pure single level lumbar discogenic disease: a pilot randomized trial.单纯单节段腰椎间盘源性疾病患者的反向疗法:一项初步随机试验。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(17):1473-80. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.647231. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
5
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Computed tomography examination of the influence of autotraction on herniation of the lumbar disc.计算机断层扫描检查自动牵引对腰椎间盘突出症的影响。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1985;104(5):289-93. doi: 10.1007/BF00435944.
7
Effects of patient-specific three-dimensional lumbar traction on pain and functional disability in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse.患者特异性三维腰椎牵引对腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛和功能障碍的影响。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;23(4):498-502. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_285_19.
8
Predictive outcome factors in the young patient treated with lumbar disc herniation surgery.接受腰椎间盘突出症手术治疗的年轻患者的预后预测因素。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Oct;25(4):448-455. doi: 10.3171/2016.2.SPINE16136. Epub 2016 May 20.
9
Autotraction versus manual traction in patients with prolapsed lumbar intervertebral discs.腰椎间盘突出症患者的自动牵引与手动牵引
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1984;16(3):117-24.
10
High-Force Versus Low-Force Lumbar Traction in Acute Lumbar Sciatica Due to Disc Herniation: A Preliminary Randomized Trial.高力量与低力量腰椎牵引治疗椎间盘突出所致急性腰椎坐骨神经痛的初步随机试验
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Nov-Dec;39(9):645-654. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Lumbar Disk Herniation a Potential Risk Factor for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome? Insights From a Misdiagnosed Case.腰椎间盘突出症是慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的潜在危险因素吗?来自一例误诊病例的见解。
Am J Mens Health. 2025 Sep-Oct;19(5):15579883251377300. doi: 10.1177/15579883251377300. Epub 2025 Sep 18.
2
Self-Administered Traction as an Adjunct in the Chiropractic Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Case Report.自我牵引作为脊椎按摩疗法治疗腰痛的辅助手段:一例报告
J Chiropr Med. 2024 Dec;23(4):205-214. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
3
Vertical traction for lumbar radiculopathy: a systematic review.
腰椎神经根病的垂直牵引:一项系统评价
Arch Physiother. 2021 Mar 15;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00102-5.
4
Assessment of variability in traction interventions for patients with low back pain: a systematic review.腰痛患者牵引干预的变异性评估:一项系统综述
Chiropr Man Therap. 2018 Sep 17;26:35. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0205-z. eCollection 2018.
5
The effectiveness of therapeutic strategies for patients with radiculopathy: A network meta-analysis.神经根病患者治疗策略的疗效:网络荟萃分析。
Mol Pain. 2018 Jan-Dec;14:1744806918768972. doi: 10.1177/1744806918768972.
6
Traction for low-back pain with or without sciatica.伴有或不伴有坐骨神经痛的下背痛的牵引治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 19;2013(8):CD003010. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003010.pub5.
7
Herniated lumbar disc.腰椎间盘突出症
BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Jun 28;2011:1118.
8
Herniated lumbar disc.腰椎间盘突出症
BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Mar 26;2009:1118.
9
Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review.非侵入性治疗方式对背痛的疗效:一项循证综述。
Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S64-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1048-6. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
10
Effect of continuous lumbar traction on the size of herniated disc material in lumbar disc herniation.持续腰椎牵引对腰椎间盘突出症中椎间盘突出物大小的影响。
Rheumatol Int. 2006 May;26(7):622-6. doi: 10.1007/s00296-005-0035-x. Epub 2005 Oct 25.