Jasinschi R, Rosenfeld A, Araújo H J
Computer Vision Laboratory, University of Maryland, College Park 20742-3275.
Spat Vis. 1993;7(2):149-82. doi: 10.1163/156856893x00333.
The perception of luminance transparency for superimposed patterns depends on how luminance, figural, and topological conditions are simultaneously satisfied. Motion transparency or coherence for two superimposed patterns, which correspond to the perception of both patterns moving across one another or to the perception of compound motion of the regions of pattern intersection, depends on the relation between the local velocity, luminance, and shape information. This study analyzes how luminance, shape, and local velocity interact in the perception of motion transparency and coherence. Psychophysical experiments done with sinusoidally modulated bar patterns are presented which show that the perception of motion transparency or coherence can be described as the result of the interaction of two integration modules: the velocity-luminance and the velocity-shape processes. The velocity-luminance process describes the integration of the local velocity with luminance information. When the luminance transparency rules are satisfied this process always generates the perception of motion transparency independently of the shape or contour information. On the other hand, when the luminance transparency rules are violated one can either perceive motion coherence or non-rigid motion; one perceives motion coherence when the patterns have small or zero amplitude, and non-rigid motion when the patterns have large amplitude. The velocity-shape process describes the integration of local velocity with shape information, and this depends on the relation between the error in the extraction of the local velocity and the magnitude of the contour amplitude. As a result of these experiments it is conjectured that the velocity-luminance and the velocity-shape processes do interact constructively or destructively. The constructive interaction occurs when the luminance transparency rules are satisfied. The destructive interaction occurs when the luminance transparency rules are violated, and such that, although the patterns contain sufficient shape information to solve the aperture problem and therefore generate the perception of motion transparency, one perceives non-rigid motion. This shows that global information describing the stratification of superimposed patterns can affect the integration of local velocity information with, for example, shape information, and this is not described by current motion theories.
叠加图案的亮度透明度感知取决于亮度、图形和拓扑条件如何同时得到满足。两个叠加图案的运动透明度或连贯性,对应于两个图案相互穿过的感知或图案相交区域的复合运动感知,取决于局部速度、亮度和形状信息之间的关系。本研究分析了亮度、形状和局部速度在运动透明度和连贯性感知中是如何相互作用的。文中展示了用正弦调制条形图案进行的心理物理学实验,这些实验表明,运动透明度或连贯性的感知可以描述为两个整合模块相互作用的结果:速度 - 亮度和速度 - 形状过程。速度 - 亮度过程描述了局部速度与亮度信息的整合。当亮度透明度规则得到满足时,这个过程总是独立于形状或轮廓信息产生运动透明度的感知。另一方面,当亮度透明度规则被违反时,人们要么感知到运动连贯性,要么感知到非刚性运动;当图案的振幅较小或为零时,人们感知到运动连贯性,而当图案的振幅较大时,人们感知到非刚性运动。速度 - 形状过程描述了局部速度与形状信息的整合,这取决于局部速度提取中的误差与轮廓振幅大小之间的关系。这些实验的结果推测,速度 - 亮度和速度 - 形状过程确实会进行建设性或破坏性的相互作用。当亮度透明度规则得到满足时,会发生建设性相互作用。当亮度透明度规则被违反时,会发生破坏性相互作用,并且,尽管图案包含足够的形状信息来解决孔径问题,因此产生运动透明度的感知,但人们却感知到非刚性运动。这表明描述叠加图案分层的全局信息可以影响局部速度信息与例如形状信息的整合,而当前的运动理论并未对此进行描述。