Parkin A J, Hunkin N M
Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton.
Cortex. 1993 Jun;29(2):267-80. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80180-3.
This study examined the memory performance of patient RK who developed substantial memory impairments due to a hypothalamic glioma but in the absence of any evidence of frontal disturbance. RK was evaluated on both tests of anterograde and retrograde memory for temporal context. In the first experiment he exhibited marked deficits on a list discrimination task even when recognition performance was well within control range. Experiment 2 confirmed this disproportionate impairment of temporal order memory and showed that RK's list discrimination deficit was as severe as that found in alcoholic Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome patients. Experiment 3 showed that RK's temporal discrimination deficit was not a general deficit in discrimination because he performed normally on a spatial discrimination test of comparable difficulty to the temporal task. Experiment 4 examined RK's memory for deceased famous people and his ability to indicate the half decade in which they died. RK's performance was indistinguishable from controls whereas WKS patients were extremely impaired. This study adds to the view that frontal damage is not a necessary condition for impairment on anterograde measures of temporal context memory. However, further evidence from this study indicates that temporal judgments about pre-existing memories may depend on intact frontal lobe functioning.
本研究考察了患者RK的记忆表现。RK因下丘脑胶质瘤而出现严重的记忆障碍,但没有任何额叶功能紊乱的证据。对RK进行了顺行性和逆行性时间背景记忆测试评估。在第一个实验中,即使识别表现完全在正常范围内,他在列表辨别任务上仍表现出明显缺陷。实验2证实了时间顺序记忆的这种不成比例的损伤,并表明RK的列表辨别缺陷与酒精性韦尼克-科尔萨科夫综合征患者的情况一样严重。实验3表明,RK的时间辨别缺陷并非一般的辨别缺陷,因为他在与时间任务难度相当的空间辨别测试中表现正常。实验4考察了RK对已故名人的记忆以及他指出名人去世年代的能力。RK的表现与对照组无异,而韦尼克-科尔萨科夫综合征患者则严重受损。这项研究进一步支持了以下观点:额叶损伤并非顺行性时间背景记忆受损的必要条件。然而,本研究的进一步证据表明,对既有记忆的时间判断可能依赖于完整的额叶功能。