Coleman R L, Schink J C, Miller D S, Bauer K D, August C Z, Rademaker A W, Lurain J R
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois.
Gynecol Oncol. 1993 Jul;50(1):20-4. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1157.
Twenty-one (8%) of 264 consecutive evaluable patients with clinical stage 1 endometrial carcinoma had histologic evidence of pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases. DNA flow cytometry was performed on both the primary tumor and nodal metastasis. Seventeen of 21 sets could be analyzed. Overall, 11 (65%) of the primary carcinomas were aneuploid. Nine of 17 (53%) had consistent ploidy patterns when the primary tumor and lymphatic metastasis were compared. The remaining 8 (47%) had aneuploid primaries with diploid nodal metastases. Five (83%) of the 6 patients with diploid primary tumors were alive without evidence of disease compared to 3 of 11 (27%) patients with aneuploid tumors (P < 0.05). Other predictors of disease outcome included tumor histology, lymph vascular space invasion, and depth of myometrial invasion. Ploidy status of the lymphatic metastasis was not important in terms of overall survival. All 8 patients with para-aortic nodal metastases had aneuploid primary carcinomas compared to 4 (44%) of 9 patients with pelvic node involvement only (P < 0.01). Mean survival was 31 months for patients with para-aortic node metastases compared to 51 months for patients with only pelvic node metastases. Comparison of survival curves among these two groups demonstrated a significant survival advantage in patients with regional nodal metastases (P = 0.032). S-phase fraction of both the primary tumor and lymphatic metastasis did not correlate with survival or predict disease outcome. DNA index of the primary tumor, as a continuous variable, was inversely proportional to survival, demonstrating poorer survivorship with incremental increases of DI. Ploidy status of the lymph node metastasis was an inconsistent reflection of the primary tumor's expression and behavior and, therefore, little additional information was gained by knowledge of the lymphatic ploidy status.
在264例连续可评估的临床1期子宫内膜癌患者中,21例(8%)有盆腔和/或腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的组织学证据。对原发性肿瘤和淋巴结转移灶均进行了DNA流式细胞术检测。21组中有17组可进行分析。总体而言,11例(65%)原发性癌为非整倍体。在比较原发性肿瘤和淋巴转移灶时,17例中有9例(53%)具有一致的倍体模式。其余8例(47%)原发性肿瘤为非整倍体,而淋巴结转移灶为二倍体。6例二倍体原发性肿瘤患者中有5例(83%)存活且无疾病证据,相比之下,11例非整倍体肿瘤患者中有3例(27%)存活(P<0.05)。疾病预后的其他预测因素包括肿瘤组织学、淋巴管间隙浸润和肌层浸润深度。就总生存期而言,淋巴结转移灶的倍体状态并不重要。所有8例腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移患者的原发性癌均为非整倍体,相比之下,仅盆腔淋巴结受累的9例患者中有4例(44%)为非整倍体(P<0.01)。腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移患者的平均生存期为31个月,而仅盆腔淋巴结转移患者的平均生存期为51个月。这两组患者生存曲线的比较显示,区域淋巴结转移患者具有显著的生存优势(P=0.032)。原发性肿瘤和淋巴结转移灶的S期分数与生存期无关,也不能预测疾病预后。作为连续变量的原发性肿瘤的DNA指数与生存期呈反比,表明随着DI的增加,生存期更差。淋巴结转移灶的倍体状态并不能一致反映原发性肿瘤的表达和行为,因此,了解淋巴管倍体状态并不能获得更多信息。