Shima T, Haga S, Momose K, Andoh K, Koga Y, Hashimoto Y
Department of Anesthesiology, Sendai Red Cross Hospital.
Masui. 1993 Jul;42(7):979-84.
We compared the combined spinal and thoracic epidural analgesia with 2% lidocaine for caesarean section, with spinal analgesia using 2% lidocaine, tetracaine or dibucaine, and also with lumbar epidural analgesia. The analgesia at high thoracic level could be achieved with combined spinal and epidural analgesia more easily than with others. The frequency of side effects with the combined spinal and epidural analgesia, such as hypotension, decrease of fetal heart rate and so on, was less than that with others. In conclusion, the combined spinal and thoracic epidural analgesia with 2% lidocaine is more useful for caesarean section, than the spinal analgesia or the lumbar epidural analgesia alone.
我们比较了剖宫产术中2%利多卡因腰麻联合胸段硬膜外镇痛、2%利多卡因、丁卡因或布比卡因腰麻以及腰段硬膜外镇痛的效果。与其他方法相比,腰麻联合胸段硬膜外镇痛更易达到高胸段水平的镇痛效果。腰麻联合胸段硬膜外镇痛的副作用发生率,如低血压、胎儿心率下降等,低于其他方法。总之,剖宫产术中2%利多卡因腰麻联合胸段硬膜外镇痛比单纯腰麻或腰段硬膜外镇痛更有效。