Wever E F, Hauer R N, Oomen A, Peters R H, Bakker P F, Robles de Medina E O
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Circulation. 1993 Sep;88(3):1021-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.3.1021.
Prognosis in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmia without structural heart disease (primary electrical disease) has been described as excellent. However, prognosis may be less favourable in the subgroup surviving an episode of ventricular fibrillation.
We prospectively followed 19 consecutive patients (age, 13 to 66 years; mean age, 33 years) who had survived an episode of documented ventricular fibrillation. Structural heart disease, preexcitation, and long QT syndromes were excluded by thorough cardiologic evaluation. All patients underwent 24-hour Holter monitoring, exercise testing, and programmed electrical stimulation according to a standardized protocol. Holter monitoring revealed episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmia in 5 patients. Exercise testing reproducibly provoked ventricular tachycardia in 2 patients. Baseline programmed electrical stimulation yielded inducibility of rapid ventricular tachyarrhythmia in 10 patients (53%) and noninducibility in 9 (47%). Nine patients were discharged on antiarrhythmic drug therapy. A defibrillator was implanted in 10 patients. During 43-month follow-up (range, 5 to 85 months; median, 41 months), major arrhythmic events recurred in 7 patients (37%). Four of these patients had noninducibility at baseline programmed electrical stimulation. Two patients on antiarrhythmic drugs had recurrent cardiac arrest: one died suddenly and the other was successfully resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation and subsequently underwent defibrillator implantation. In the other 5 patients, termination of (pre)syncopal episodes was associated with defibrillator shocks. Termination of ventricular fibrillation was documented by Holter recording in one of these patients. Specific markers predictive of a recurrent event could not be identified, although 6 of 7 patients with recurrent events had experienced at least one episode of cardiac arrest or (pre)syncope before the index episode.
Patients with primary electrical disease presenting with ventricular fibrillation are at high risk of recurrence of major arrhythmic events during long-term follow-up. Noninducibility at baseline study does not predict an uneventful course. Also, early defibrillator implantation should be considered in these patients.
无结构性心脏病(原发性心电疾病)的室性快速心律失常患者的预后被描述为良好。然而,在经历过一次心室颤动发作后存活下来的亚组患者中,预后可能不太乐观。
我们前瞻性地随访了19例连续的患者(年龄13至66岁;平均年龄33岁),这些患者均经历过一次记录在案的心室颤动发作。通过全面的心脏评估排除了结构性心脏病、预激综合征和长QT综合征。所有患者均按照标准化方案接受了24小时动态心电图监测、运动试验和程控电刺激。动态心电图监测显示5例患者出现室性快速心律失常发作。运动试验在2例患者中可重复性诱发室性心动过速。基线程控电刺激使10例患者(53%)诱发出快速室性快速心律失常,9例患者(47%)未诱发出。9例患者出院时接受抗心律失常药物治疗。10例患者植入了除颤器。在43个月的随访期间(范围5至85个月;中位数41个月),7例患者(37%)再次发生主要心律失常事件。其中4例患者在基线程控电刺激时未诱发出心律失常。2例接受抗心律失常药物治疗的患者发生心脏骤停复发:1例突然死亡,另1例从心室颤动中成功复苏,随后接受了除颤器植入。在另外5例患者中,(先兆)晕厥发作的终止与除颤器电击有关。其中1例患者通过动态心电图记录证实心室颤动终止。尽管7例复发事件患者中有6例在索引事件之前经历过至少一次心脏骤停或(先兆)晕厥,但未能识别出预测复发事件的特异性标志物。
原发性心电疾病伴心室颤动的患者在长期随访中发生主要心律失常事件复发的风险很高。基线研究时未诱发出心律失常并不能预测病程平稳。此外,这些患者应考虑早期植入除颤器。