Van Train K F, Areeda J, Garcia E V, Cooke C D, Maddahi J, Kiat H, Germano G, Silagan G, Folks R, Berman D S
Department of Imaging (Nuclear Medicine), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048.
J Nucl Med. 1993 Sep;34(9):1494-502.
Gender-matched stress normal limits and criteria for abnormality for rest-stress 99mTc-sestamibi same-day myocardial perfusion imaging were developed and validated in 160 patients who were imaged using previously developed optimized acquisition, processing and quantitative protocols. The gender-matched mean and standard deviation of the normal response were calculated using 35 male and 25 female patients with a < 5% likelihood of coronary artery disease. Receiver-operating curve analysis using expert visual interpretation as the "gold standard" was used to determine the optimal criteria for abnormality detection, in terms of standard deviations from the mean and minimum defect size for each of the four major zones of the polar map, in a pilot population consisting of an additional 35 male and 25 female patients with a variety of perfusion defects. The optimum standard deviations resulted in the following true-positive/true-negative rates when quantitative results were compared to visual analysis for the anterior, septal, lateral, and inferior segments in the combined male and female pilot populations: 84%/86%, 70%/75%, 86%/76% and 69%/76%, respectively. The final criteria were then applied to a prospective population consisting of 33 male and 7 female patients. This analysis resulted in the following true-positive/true-negative rates for overall perfusion abnormalities and abnormalities of the LAD, LCX and RCA vascular territories: 97%/67%, 94%/73%, 73%/90% and 72%/91%, respectively. The optimized 99mTc-sestamibi stress normal limits and criteria for abnormality correlate well with expert visual interpretation of stress myocardial perfusion defects.
针对静息-负荷99mTc-司他米比同日心肌灌注成像,制定了性别匹配的应激正常限度及异常标准,并在160例患者中进行了验证。这些患者采用先前制定的优化采集、处理和定量方案进行成像。使用35例男性和25例女性冠状动脉疾病可能性<5%的患者计算正常反应的性别匹配均值和标准差。在由另外35例男性和25例女性具有各种灌注缺损的患者组成的试验人群中,以专家视觉解读作为“金标准”,采用受试者操作曲线分析来确定异常检测的最佳标准,即极坐标图四个主要区域中每个区域相对于均值的标准差和最小缺损大小。当将定量结果与联合的男性和女性试验人群中前壁、间隔、侧壁和下壁节段的视觉分析进行比较时,最佳标准差产生的真阳性/真阴性率如下:分别为84%/86%、70%/75%、86%/76%和69%/76%。然后将最终标准应用于由33例男性和7例女性患者组成的前瞻性人群。该分析得出总体灌注异常以及左前降支、左旋支和右冠状动脉血管区域异常的真阳性/真阴性率如下:分别为97%/67%、94%/73%、73%/90%和72%/91%。优化后的99mTc-司他米比应激正常限度及异常标准与应激心肌灌注缺损的专家视觉解读相关性良好。