Suppr超能文献

宫颈激光锥形活检的热伪像及妇科医生之间的差异。

Thermal artifacts and inter-gynecologist variation of laser cone biopsies of the cervix.

作者信息

Helkjaer P E, Schultz H, Eriksen P S, Rath J, Thomsen C F

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Central Hospital Naestved, Denmark.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;82(3):435-9.

PMID:8355948
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the extent of thermal artifacts and the inter-gynecologist variation in CO2 laser cone biopsies for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) using high power density.

METHODS

All 1180 histologic sections from 93 CO2 laser cone biopsies performed by nine gynecologists were evaluated by morphometry. Power density of 19,700 W/cm2 and spot size of 0.43 mm were used. The lengths of different epithelia, the distance from CIN to the excision margins, the thermal artifacts, and the extension of denudation were analyzed. Mean values and standard deviations were analyzed for all indices. The inter-gynecologist variation was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, Tukey-Kramer Honestly Significant Difference test, and chi 2 contingency table analysis regarding cones classified as "good" or "not good".

RESULTS

The mean length of analyzed surface per cone was 134 mm. In 3% of the sections, the sum of artifacts at the external excision margin exceeded the average "minimum free distance" from CIN to the margin (2.88 mm). At the endocervical excision margin, the free distance was exceeded in 17% of the sections. Eighteen percent of the cones had CIN at the excision margins, with no significant differences between gynecologists (P = .83). Differences existed between gynecologists regarding free minimum distance and minor thermal artifacts at the external margin, but when clinically relevant groups were applied, no significant differences were found (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

We found that a high power density at CO2 laser cone biopsy resulted in specimens with minimal thermal artifacts compared to other authors who used low power density. No clinically relevant differences were found between the gynecologists regarding free margins or artifacts.

摘要

目的

评估使用高功率密度的二氧化碳激光对宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)进行锥形活检时热伪像的程度以及妇科医生之间的差异。

方法

对9名妇科医生进行的93例二氧化碳激光锥形活检的1180个组织学切片进行形态测量评估。使用的功率密度为19700W/cm²,光斑尺寸为0.43mm。分析不同上皮的长度、CIN到切除边缘的距离、热伪像以及剥脱范围。对所有指标分析均值和标准差。使用单因素方差分析、Tukey-Kramer诚实显著差异检验以及关于分类为“好”或“不好”的锥形的卡方列联表分析来分析妇科医生之间的差异。

结果

每个锥形分析表面的平均长度为134mm。在3%的切片中,外部切除边缘的伪像总和超过了CIN到边缘的平均“最小自由距离”(2.88mm)。在宫颈管内切除边缘,17%的切片超过了自由距离。18%的锥形在切除边缘有CIN,妇科医生之间无显著差异(P = 0.83)。妇科医生在外部边缘的自由最小距离和轻微热伪像方面存在差异,但应用临床相关分组时,未发现显著差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

我们发现,与使用低功率密度的其他作者相比,二氧化碳激光锥形活检时高功率密度导致标本的热伪像最小。在自由边缘或伪像方面,妇科医生之间未发现临床相关差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验