Voge V M, Tolan G
Armstrong Laboratory, Brooks AFB, TX.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1993 Jul;64(7):662-5.
This is the second of two articles describing reported incidents involving hazardous cargo on U.S. military aircraft over a 10-year period. In this article, we describe the various physiological responses reported on the incident reports. These physiological incidents may have involved either the aircrew, the passengers, or both. We also list the substances that caused the problems. Physiological responses ranged from nausea and lightheadedness to loss of consciousness. We discuss why flights involving a physiological incident may not have been aborted. The present military hazardous cargo incident reporting system is deficient in that there appears to be no requirement for reporting whether passengers were on board the incident aircraft, or whether passengers or aircrew suffered physiological responses to various toxic substances.
这是两篇文章中的第二篇,描述了10年间美国军用飞机上涉及危险货物的报告事件。在本文中,我们描述了事件报告中所报告的各种生理反应。这些生理事件可能涉及机组人员、乘客或两者。我们还列出了导致问题的物质。生理反应范围从恶心、头晕到失去意识。我们讨论了涉及生理事件的航班为何可能没有中止。当前的军事危险货物事件报告系统存在缺陷,因为似乎没有要求报告涉事飞机上是否有乘客,或者乘客或机组人员是否对各种有毒物质产生了生理反应。