Suppr超能文献

口服氟康唑与口服多烯类药物预防中性粒细胞减少症高危患者真菌感染的随机对照研究。多中心研究组。

Randomized comparison of oral fluconazole versus oral polyenes for the prevention of fungal infection in patients at risk of neutropenia. Multicentre Study Group.

作者信息

Philpott-Howard J N, Wade J J, Mufti G J, Brammer K W, Ehninger G

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31(6):973-84. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.6.973.

Abstract

An open, randomized study was performed at 18 European centres to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerance of oral fluconazole with oral polyenes for the prophylaxis of fungal colonization and infection in adults at high risk of developing neutropenia. Five hundred and thirty-six hospitalized patients with malignant disease, about to receive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or bone marrow transplantation, and who were already neutropenic or were expected to develop neutropenia were included in the study. Before therapy or transplantation, patients commenced either oral fluconazole therapy (50 mg/day as a single dose) or oral polyenes therapy (amphotericin B 2 g/day and/or nystatin 4 x 10(6) units/day in four or more divided doses), for a mean of 29.3 days and 31.3 days, respectively. After baseline clinical and mycological testing, patients were re-evaluated at least weekly during prophylaxis, at the end of prophylaxis and two to six weeks later to identify proven or suspected fungal infection and to determine rates of colonization with fungi. Fungal infection was diagnosed in 41 of 511 evaluable patients, 10 (3.9%) of 256 in the fluconazole group and 31 (12.2%) of 255 in the polyene group (P = 0.001). This total included four patients (1.6%) in the fluconazole group who developed oropharyngeal candidiasis compared with 22 (8.6%) in the polyene group (P < 0.001). Systemic infections comprised 6 (2.3%) in the fluconazole group and 9 (3.5%) in the polyene group (P = not significant), and included three Candida krusei infections in each group. Parenteral amphotericin B therapy was given empirically for persistent fevers in an additional 62 (24.2%) patients receiving fluconazole and 59 (23.1%) receiving polyenes (P = not significant). Colonization with fungi was generally similar in each treatment group, although an increased proportion of patients receiving fluconazole developed colonization of the faeces (P < 0.01). Adverse reactions, possibly related to treatment, were recorded in 15 (5.6%) of 269 patients in the fluconazole group and 14 (5.2%) of 267 in the polyene group; these necessitated discontinuation of therapy in seven patients in each group. Once-a-day fluconazole was therefore more effective than oral polyenes for the prevention of oropharyngeal fungal infection and as effective for the prevention of infections at other sites in patients with neutropenia.

摘要

在18个欧洲中心进行了一项开放性随机研究,以比较口服氟康唑与口服多烯类药物在预防有发生中性粒细胞减少症高风险的成人真菌定植和感染方面的疗效、安全性和耐受性。536例患有恶性疾病且即将接受化疗、放疗或骨髓移植的住院患者被纳入研究,这些患者已经出现中性粒细胞减少或预计会发生中性粒细胞减少。在治疗或移植前,患者开始接受口服氟康唑治疗(50毫克/天,单次给药)或口服多烯类药物治疗(两性霉素B 2克/天和/或制霉菌素4×10⁶单位/天,分四次或更多次给药),平均治疗时间分别为29.3天和31.3天。在进行基线临床和真菌学检测后,患者在预防期间至少每周重新评估一次,在预防结束时以及两至六周后进行重新评估,以确定确诊或疑似真菌感染,并确定真菌定植率。在511例可评估患者中,有41例被诊断为真菌感染,氟康唑组256例中有10例(3.9%),多烯类药物组255例中有31例(12.2%)(P = 0.001)。这其中包括氟康唑组4例(1.6%)发生口咽念珠菌病,而多烯类药物组有22例(8.6%)(P < 0.001)。全身性感染在氟康唑组中有6例(2.3%),在多烯类药物组中有9例(3.5%)(P = 无显著差异),每组均包括3例克鲁斯念珠菌感染。另外,在接受氟康唑治疗的62例(24.2%)患者和接受多烯类药物治疗的59例(23.1%)患者中,根据经验给予了静脉注射两性霉素B治疗持续性发热(P = 无显著差异)。每个治疗组的真菌定植情况总体相似,尽管接受氟康唑治疗的患者粪便定植比例有所增加(P < 0.01)。氟康唑组269例患者中有15例(5.6%)记录到可能与治疗相关的不良反应,多烯类药物组267例中有14例(5.2%);每组均有7例患者因此需要停止治疗。因此,对于预防口咽真菌感染,每日一次的氟康唑比口服多烯类药物更有效,并且在预防中性粒细胞减少患者其他部位感染方面同样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验