Hopert A, Uphoff C C, Wirth M, Hauser H, Drexler H G
DSM, Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen, Braunschweig, Germany.
J Immunol Methods. 1993 Aug 26;164(1):91-100. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(93)90279-g.
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was used for the detection of mycoplasma contamination in 42 continuous cell lines. Using the microbiological cultivation on agar as the reference method, 29 cell lines were regarded as positive and 13 cell lines as negative. The double-step PCR analysis employed nested primers that anneal to gene sequences coding for the evolutionarily conserved 16 S rRNA of some 25 different mycoplasma species (including the ones most commonly found in cell cultures). In terms of the positivity or negativity of mycoplasma infection the results were identical for the agar assay and PCR amplification. All positive cell lines displayed distinct, unequivocal, objectively discernible bands on agarose gels while the non-infected specimens showed no DNA amplification. A simultaneously performed comparison with four other commonly used detection methods (DNA-RNA hybridization in solution, DAPI DNA fluorescence staining, immunostaining with a monoclonal antibody and an ELISA) showed that PCR produced significantly less false-negative or false-positive results than all the other methods. Furthermore, in dilution experiments, PCR correctly detected the infecting mycoplasmas at the lowest level of 1/10(4) whereas the other assays were less sensitive. It is concluded that double-step PCR employing nested primers is superior to other mycoplasma detection methods in many respects: simplicity and speed, high specificity and extreme sensitivity, objectivity and accuracy.
采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)扩增技术检测42种连续传代细胞系中的支原体污染情况。以琼脂平板微生物培养法作为参照方法,29种细胞系被判定为阳性,13种细胞系为阴性。两步法PCR分析采用巢式引物,这些引物可与约25种不同支原体(包括细胞培养中最常见的支原体)编码进化保守16S rRNA的基因序列退火结合。就支原体感染的阳性或阴性结果而言,琼脂平板检测法和PCR扩增法的结果一致。所有阳性细胞系在琼脂糖凝胶上均显示出清晰、明确、可客观辨别的条带,而未感染的样本则未出现DNA扩增。同时与其他四种常用检测方法(溶液中的DNA - RNA杂交、DAPI DNA荧光染色、单克隆抗体免疫染色和ELISA)进行比较,结果显示PCR产生的假阴性或假阳性结果明显少于其他所有方法。此外,在稀释实验中,PCR能在最低1/10(4)的水平正确检测出感染的支原体,而其他检测方法的敏感性较低。结论是,采用巢式引物的两步法PCR在许多方面优于其他支原体检测方法:操作简单快速、特异性高、灵敏度极高、结果客观准确。