Beatson J A
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1993 Jun;27(2):319-23. doi: 10.3109/00048679309075784.
Consideration of peer review is timely, given that formalization of peer review processes is one of the responses the psychiatric profession could make to increasing calls for accountability from within and without the profession. The establishment of formal peer review evoked strong, often hostile, responses among psychiatrists in the United States, reflecting considerable underlying anxiety. This paper examines the responses to formal peer review in psychiatrists from a psychodynamic perspective.
鉴于同行评审流程的正规化是精神病学专业对来自行业内外日益增长的问责呼声的回应之一，对同行评审的考量是及时的。在美国，正式同行评审的建立在精神病医生中引发了强烈的、往往是敌对的反应，这反映出相当程度的潜在焦虑。本文从精神动力学角度审视了精神病医生对正式同行评审的反应。
