• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法医精神病学与法医心理学之间的差异。

The differences between forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology.

作者信息

Grisso T

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester 01655.

出版信息

Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1993;21(2):133-45.

PMID:8364232
Abstract

Forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology face a common threat: the erosion of their credibility. It is proposed that they can combat this threat better by collaboration than by independent efforts. Similarities between the two professions are reviewed to examine their potential for collaboration. Their differences are reviewed to demonstrate the value of that which they can contribute collaboratively, beyond that which either can contribute independently, to increasing their credibility in the eyes of the public and the courts. Three specific areas for collaboration are proposed: individual practice, quality control of expert testimony, and training.

摘要

法医精神病学和法医心理学面临着一个共同的威胁

其可信度的逐渐丧失。有人提出,它们通过合作比独立行动能更好地应对这一威胁。对这两个专业之间的相似之处进行了审视,以考察它们合作的潜力。对它们的差异进行了审视,以证明它们通过合作所能做出的贡献的价值,这一价值超出了它们各自独立所能做出的贡献,有助于在公众和法庭眼中提高它们的可信度。文中提出了三个具体的合作领域:个人执业、专家证言的质量控制以及培训。

相似文献

1
The differences between forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology.法医精神病学与法医心理学之间的差异。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1993;21(2):133-45.
2
Who's afraid of forensic psychiatry?谁害怕法医精神病学?
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1990;18(3):235-47.
3
The child and adolescent track in the forensic fellowship.法医研究员项目中的儿童和青少年研究方向。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2011 Jul;20(3):565-75. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2011.03.010.
4
[General problems of expert testimony of psychiatrists and clinical psychologists in legal procedures and the suggestions for their cooperation].
Psychiatr Pol. 1989 Sep-Dec;23(5-6):403-11.
5
Competence to stand trial in Connecticut.在康涅狄格州受审的能力。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1983;11(3):261-71.
6
Public skepticism: forensic psychiatry's albatross.公众的怀疑:法医精神病学的沉重负担。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1977;5(4):456-63.
7
An agenda for quality improvement in forensic mental health consultation.法医精神健康咨询中的质量改进议程。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1993;21(1):5-21.
8
Gender and the experience of mental health expert witness testimony.性别与心理健康专家证人证言的经历。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2015 Mar;43(1):52-9.
9
From schadenfreude to contemplation: lessons for forensic experts.从幸灾乐祸到沉思:法医专家的教训。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2012;40(1):81-8.
10
Toward a critical forensic psychiatry.迈向批判性法医精神病学。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2003;31(2):232-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of assessment instruments in forensic evaluations of criminal responsibility in Norway.挪威刑事责任法医评估中评估工具的使用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 1;22(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03831-4.
2
Collaboration: The Paradigm of Practice Approach between the Forensic Psychiatrist and the Forensic Psychologist.合作:法医精神病学家和法医心理学家之间的实践方法范式。
Front Psychiatry. 2012 Nov 15;3:89. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00089. eCollection 2012.