Suppr超能文献

依那普利与氢氯噻嗪联合用药治疗高血压的疗效及耐受性:手动测量与动态血压监测

Efficacy and tolerability of a combination of enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of hypertension measured manually and with an ambulatory blood pressure monitor.

作者信息

Weir M R, Lavin P T, Byrnes C A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1993 May-Jun;15(3):527-38.

PMID:8364944
Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of an enalapril maleate-hydrochlorothiazide combination (EM-HCTZ) were evaluated in a prospective, open-label study in 26 patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension (mean baseline sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure: 153/103 mmHg) requiring two agents to reduce sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) below 90 mmHg. Their mean age was 52 years. Patients received enalapril 5 mg daily, which was increased to 10 mg if SDBP was not reduced to < 90 mmHg during a 5-week titration period following washout. If blood pressure did not reach that goal, 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide was added. Only patients who required enalapril 10 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg for control (SDBP < 90 mmHg) at the end of titration received open-label EM-HCTZ as maintenance therapy for 6 weeks. The SDBP of 19 of the 26 patients (73%) who began titration was controlled at the end of titration, and they received maintenance therapy. During maintenance, the mean SDBP decreased from baseline 13.2 mmHg at week 2, 13.3 mmHg at week 4, and 10.1 mmHg at week 6. All changes from baseline were significant. At the end of the maintenance period, SDBP was controlled in 8 (42%) of 19 patients enrolled. One patient was withdrawn from the study because blood pressure was poorly controlled. Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) was monitored, average outcome was computed for each patient during the 24-hour interval, and with a paired comparison, baseline and follow-up data were compared with the data measured manually. The mean baseline ABP was 9 mmHg lower than the baseline SDBP measured manually (r = 0.58, P = 0.01). Following treatment with EM-HCTZ, mean diastolic blood pressure fell 10 mmHg and mean systolic blood pressure fell 15 mmHg. In summary, EM-HCTZ was highly effective and generally well-tolerated in a substantial proportion of participants whose SDBP remained > 90 mmHg on enalapril 10 mg. Important differences between blood pressure measured manually and with a monitor were also demonstrated.

摘要

在一项前瞻性、开放标签研究中,对26例单纯性原发性高血压患者(平均基线坐位收缩压/舒张压:153/103 mmHg)进行了马来酸依那普利-氢氯噻嗪组合(EM-HCTZ)的疗效和耐受性评估,这些患者需要两种药物才能将坐位舒张压(SDBP)降至90 mmHg以下。他们的平均年龄为52岁。患者每天服用5 mg依那普利,如果在洗脱后的5周滴定期内SDBP未降至<90 mmHg,则增加至10 mg。如果血压未达到该目标,则添加25 mg氢氯噻嗪。只有在滴定结束时需要10 mg依那普利和25 mg氢氯噻嗪来控制血压(SDBP<90 mmHg)的患者才接受开放标签的EM-HCTZ作为维持治疗6周。开始滴定的26例患者中有19例(73%)的SDBP在滴定结束时得到控制,他们接受了维持治疗。在维持治疗期间,平均SDBP在第2周时较基线下降13.2 mmHg,第4周时下降13.3 mmHg,第6周时下降10.1 mmHg。与基线相比的所有变化均具有显著性。在维持期结束时,纳入研究的19例患者中有8例(42%)的SDBP得到控制。1例患者因血压控制不佳退出研究。对动态血压(ABP)进行了监测,计算了每位患者在24小时间隔内的平均结果,并通过配对比较将基线和随访数据与手动测量的数据进行了比较。平均基线ABP比手动测量的基线SDBP低9 mmHg(r = 0.58,P = 0.01)。用EM-HCTZ治疗后,平均舒张压下降10 mmHg,平均收缩压下降15 mmHg。总之,EM-HCTZ在很大一部分服用10 mg依那普利时SDBP仍>90 mmHg的参与者中具有高效性且总体耐受性良好。同时还显示了手动测量血压和使用监测仪测量血压之间的重要差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验