Wasicko M J, Erlichman J S, Leiter J C
Department of Physiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Jun;74(6):2694-703. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1993.74.6.2694.
We sought to determine if the upper airway response to an added inspiratory resistive load (IRL) during wakefulness could be used to predict the site of upper airway collapse in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). In 10 awake patients with OSA, we investigated the relationship between resistance in three segments of the upper airway (nasal, nasopharyngeal, and oropharyngeal) and three muscles known to influence these segments (alae nasi, tensor veli palatini, and genioglossus) while the patient breathed with or without a small IRL (2 cmH2O.l-1.s). During IRL, patients with OSA exhibited increased nasopharyngeal resistance and no significant increase in either the genioglossus or tensor veli palatini activities. Neither nasal resistance nor alae nasi EMG activity was affected by IRL. We contrasted this to the response of five normal subjects, in whom we found no change in the resistance of either segment of the airway and no change in the genioglossus EMG but a significant activation of the tensor palatini. In six patients with OSA, we used the waking data to predict the site of upper airway collapse during sleep and we had limited success. The most successful index (correct in 4 of 6 patients) incorporated the greatest relative change in segmental resistance during IRL at the lowest electromyographic activity. We conclude, in patients with OSA, IRL narrows the more collapsible segment of the upper airway, in part due to inadequate activation of upper airway muscles. However, it is difficult to predict the site of upper airway collapse based on the waking measurements where upper airway muscle activity masks the passive airway characteristics.
我们试图确定清醒时上气道对额外吸气阻力负荷(IRL)的反应是否可用于预测阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者上气道塌陷的部位。在10名清醒的OSA患者中,我们研究了上气道三个节段(鼻腔、鼻咽和口咽)的阻力与已知影响这些节段的三块肌肉(鼻翼、腭帆张肌和颏舌肌)之间的关系,患者在有或没有小IRL(2 cmH2O·l-1·s)的情况下呼吸。在IRL期间,OSA患者的鼻咽阻力增加,颏舌肌或腭帆张肌活动均无显著增加。IRL对鼻腔阻力和鼻翼肌电图活动均无影响。我们将此与5名正常受试者的反应进行对比,发现他们气道任何一个节段的阻力均无变化,颏舌肌肌电图无变化,但腭帆张肌有显著激活。在6名OSA患者中,我们利用清醒时的数据预测睡眠期间上气道塌陷的部位,成功率有限。最成功的指标(6名患者中有4名正确)纳入了IRL期间在最低肌电图活动时节段阻力的最大相对变化。我们得出结论,在OSA患者中,IRL使上气道更易塌陷的节段变窄,部分原因是上气道肌肉激活不足。然而,基于清醒时的测量结果很难预测上气道塌陷的部位,因为上气道肌肉活动掩盖了气道的被动特征。