• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运动员的跗跖关节损伤

Tarsometatarsal joint injuries in the athlete.

作者信息

Curtis M J, Myerson M, Szura B

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland 21218.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 1993 Jul-Aug;21(4):497-502. doi: 10.1177/036354659302100403.

DOI:10.1177/036354659302100403
PMID:8368407
Abstract

This is a retrospective review of the presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of 19 patients who injured the tarsometatarsal joint of the foot during athletic activity. Diagnosis by clinical and radiographic examination was supplemented by stress fluoroscopy of the articulation under anesthesia. Injuries were classified as either a first- or second-degree sprain of the tarsometatarsal joint, a third-degree sprain (with diastasis between the metatarsals or cuneiforms), a fracture, or frank dislocation. Poor functional results were seen in those for whom diagnosis was delayed and for whom the injury was not treated adequately. Three patients were unable to return to sports, one of whom eventually required fusion of the tarsometatarsal joint. The third-degree sprains were indistinguishable from fracture and fracture-dislocations in that good results were not reliably obtained by nonoperative treatment, and both classes of injury seem to require open reduction and internal fixation for optimal return to function. The delay in return to full activity is a marker of the severity of this injury despite an often benign appearance on radiograph.

摘要

这是一项对19例在体育活动中足部跗跖关节受伤患者的临床表现、诊断、治疗及预后的回顾性研究。临床和影像学检查诊断辅以麻醉下关节应力荧光透视检查。损伤分为跗跖关节一度或二度扭伤、三度扭伤(跖骨或楔骨间有分离)、骨折或完全脱位。诊断延误且损伤未得到充分治疗的患者功能预后较差。3例患者无法恢复运动,其中1例最终需要进行跗跖关节融合术。三度扭伤与骨折及骨折脱位难以区分,因为非手术治疗无法可靠地获得良好效果,这两类损伤似乎都需要切开复位内固定以实现最佳功能恢复。尽管X线片上通常表现为良性,但恢复完全活动的延迟是这种损伤严重程度的一个标志。

相似文献

1
Tarsometatarsal joint injuries in the athlete.运动员的跗跖关节损伤
Am J Sports Med. 1993 Jul-Aug;21(4):497-502. doi: 10.1177/036354659302100403.
2
[Clinical and radiographic evaluation of open reduction and internal fixation with headless compression screws in treatment of lisfranc joint injuries].无头加压螺钉切开复位内固定治疗Lisfranc关节损伤的临床及影像学评估
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Oct;27(10):1196-201.
3
Lisfranc's tarsometatarsal fracture-dislocation.利氏跗跖关节骨折脱位
Radiology. 1976 Jul;120(1):79-83. doi: 10.1148/120.1.79.
4
CT evaluation of tarsometatarsal fracture-dislocation injuries.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 May;144(5):985-90. doi: 10.2214/ajr.144.5.985.
5
[Injuries of Lisfranc's joint: severe sprains, dislocations, fractures. Study of 39 personal cases and biomechanical classification].[利斯弗朗关节损伤:严重扭伤、脱位、骨折。39例个人病例研究及生物力学分类]
J Chir (Paris). 1976 May-Jun;111(5-6):573-92.
6
Tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc's) fracture-dislocation.跗跖(利氏)骨折脱位
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1995 Feb;Suppl:7-16.
7
Injury to the tarsometatarsal joint complex.跗跖关节复合体损伤。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003 Jul-Aug;11(4):260-7. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200307000-00005.
8
Lisfranc injury in the athlete: evidence supporting management from sprain to fracture dislocation.运动员的跖跗关节损伤:支持从扭伤到骨折脱位治疗的证据
Foot Ankle Clin. 2013 Jun;18(2):219-36. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
9
Injuries of the forefoot.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977 Jan-Feb(122):18-27.
10
Tarsometatarsal joint injuries--review of clinical presentation and surgical treatment.跗跖关节损伤——临床表现与手术治疗综述
Med J Malaysia. 2005 Mar;60(1):71-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A rare Lisfranc-type injury involving dorsal dislocation of the intermediate cuneiform and second metatarsal.一种罕见的Lisfranc型损伤,累及中间楔骨和第二跖骨背侧脱位。
Radiol Case Rep. 2024 Nov 6;20(1):529-534. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.10.083. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Comparison of diagnostic performance of X‑ray, CT and MRI in patients with surgically confirmed subtle Lisfranc injuries.X线、CT及MRI对手术确诊的隐匿性Lisfranc损伤患者的诊断性能比较
Exp Ther Med. 2024 Feb 29;27(4):174. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12462. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Inconsistent radiographic diagnostic criteria for lisfranc injuries: a systematic review.
蔺氏骨折影像学诊断标准不一致:系统评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Nov 27;24(1):915. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07043-z.
4
Various Flexible Fixation Techniques Using Suture Button for Ligamentous Lisfranc Injuries: A Review of Surgical Options.各种采用缝线纽扣的韧带性 Lisfranc 损伤的灵活固定技术:手术选择的综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 12;59(6):1134. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061134.
5
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Surgical Management of Unstable Lisfranc Injuries in Athletes.运动员不稳定型Lisfranc损伤手术治疗后的患者报告结局指标
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2023 Mar 20;8(1):24730114231160762. doi: 10.1177/24730114231160762. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Shortening the Return-to-Play Times in Elite Athletes With Unstable Isolated Lisfranc Ligament Injuries Using a Knotless Interosseous Suture Button: Case Series and Literature Review.使用无结骨间缝合纽扣缩短孤立性不稳定Lisfranc韧带损伤的精英运动员的重返比赛时间:病例系列与文献综述
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jun 21;10(6):23259671221102969. doi: 10.1177/23259671221102969. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
The Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI to Evaluate Acute Lisfranc Joint Injuries: Comparison With Direct Operative Observations.MRI评估急性Lisfranc关节损伤的诊断准确性:与直接手术观察的比较
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2022 Jan 21;7(1):24730114211069080. doi: 10.1177/24730114211069080. eCollection 2022 Jan.
8
Updates on Lisfranc Complex Injuries.跖跗关节复合体损伤的最新进展。
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2021 Jan 25;6(1):2473011420982275. doi: 10.1177/2473011420982275. eCollection 2021 Jan.
9
Comparing bilateral feet computed tomography scans can improve surgical decision making for subtle Lisfranc injury.比较双侧足部 CT 扫描有助于改善对隐匿性 Lisfranc 损伤的手术决策。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Dec;142(12):3705-3714. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04182-7. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
10
Acute foot and ankle injuries and time return to sport.急性足踝损伤与恢复运动的时间
SICOT J. 2021;7:27. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2021024. Epub 2021 Apr 15.