• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Surgical treatment of recurrent stress incontinence: Burch versus lyodura sling operation--a prospective study].

作者信息

Enzelsberger H, Kurz C, Seifert M, Raimann H, Schatten C

机构信息

I. Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Wien.

出版信息

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1993 Jul;53(7):467-71. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1022915.

DOI:10.1055/s-2007-1022915
PMID:8370487
Abstract

This prospective randomised study involved 52 female patients suffering from recurrent stress urinary incontinence, objectively confirmed by means of clinical incontinence tests and urodynamic examinations. They alternatively underwent colposuspension according to Burch or suburethral sling procedure surgery. Urodynamic and sonographic examinations were carried out before and 2.5 years (i.e. within a range of 2-3) after surgery according to Burch or suburethral sling procedure. There was no significant difference between the two methods with respect to subjective and objective rate of cure, which amounted to 85% of the cases involving colposuspension and 88% of cases involving the suburethral sling procedure. Both methods resulted in a significant improvement of the depression quotient and a significant elevation of the internal urethral meatus (p < 0.05). Apart from an aggravation of urge symptoms in both groups, the patients with surgery according to Burch tended towards enterocele and rectocele in the medium range, whereas urination disorders had to be accepted in the patients operated on according to the sling procedure in the long term.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Surgical treatment of recurrent stress incontinence: Burch versus lyodura sling operation--a prospective study].
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1993 Jul;53(7):467-71. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1022915.
2
Comparison of Burch and lyodura sling procedures for repair of unsuccessful incontinence surgery.用于修复失禁手术失败的Burch手术与利奥多拉吊带手术的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Aug;88(2):251-6. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00193-7.
3
Pubo-fascial versus vaginal sling operation for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a prospective study.耻骨筋膜悬吊术与阴道吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的前瞻性研究
Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(7):627-31. doi: 10.1002/nau.20063.
4
Mersilene mesh sling: short- and long-term clinical and urodynamic outcomes.Mersilene网片吊带:短期和长期临床及尿动力学结果
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jul;185(1):32-40. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.116370.
5
[Does a Combined Fascial Sling - Burch Colposuspension Display Advantages over a Fascial Sling alone for Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence in Females?].[对于女性压力性尿失禁的治疗,联合筋膜悬吊 - 伯奇阴道悬吊术是否比单纯筋膜悬吊术更具优势?]
Aktuelle Urol. 2003 May;34(3):166-71. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40233.
6
[Prolene mesh sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Integral treatment of pelvic floor anomalies. Long-term results].[普理灵网片吊带治疗压力性尿失禁。盆底畸形的综合治疗。长期结果]
Arch Esp Urol. 2002 Nov;55(9):1057-74.
7
Sexual function after surgery for stress urinary incontinence: vaginal sling versus Burch colposuspension.压力性尿失禁手术后的性功能:阴道吊带术与Burch阴道悬吊术对比
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Jan;277(1):31-6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0418-1. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
8
[Urodynamic results of Burch colposuspension].[Burch阴道悬吊术的尿动力学结果]
Zentralbl Gynakol. 1990;112(9):577-81.
9
Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: a randomized trial.腹腔镜下Burch阴道悬吊术与无张力阴道吊带术:一项随机试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;104(6):1249-58. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000146290.10472.b3.
10
[Modified sacrocolpopexy combined with a Burch procedure for recurrent stress urinary incontinence].
Aktuelle Urol. 2006 May;37(3):205-11. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-932176.

引用本文的文献

1
Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.传统的女性尿失禁耻骨后尿道悬吊手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 28;1(1):CD001754. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001754.pub5.
2
Interventions for treating recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic midurethral tape surgery in women.女性微创合成中段尿道吊带手术失败后复发性压力性尿失禁的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 4;9(9):CD009407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009407.pub3.
3
Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
治疗女性尿失禁的传统尿道下吊带手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD001754. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001754.pub4.
4
Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.耻骨后开放式阴道膀胱悬吊术治疗女性尿失禁
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 25;7(7):CD002912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002912.pub7.