Flor H, Birbaumer N
Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Federal Republic of Germany.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Aug;61(4):653-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.61.4.653.
In this study, three types of treatments for chronic musculoskeletal pain were compared. Fifty-seven patients who suffered from chronic back pain and 21 patients who suffered from temporomandibular pain and dysfunction were randomly assigned to either electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback, cognitive-behavioral therapy, or conservative medical treatment. At posttreatment, improvements were noted in all three treatment groups, with the biofeedback group displaying the most substantial change. At the 6- and 24-month follow-up, only the biofeedback group maintained significant reductions in pain severity, interference, affective distress, pain-related use of the health care system, stress-related reactivity of the affected muscles, and an increase in active coping self-statements. Treatment outcome was predicted by chronicity and treatment-specific variables. Analysis of attrition showed a significant effect for therapist and extent of somatic pathology. Results suggest that pain patients who suffer from musculoskeletal pain problems and display few physical disabilities may profit the most from short-term EMG biofeedback treatment.
在本研究中,对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的三种治疗方法进行了比较。57名患有慢性背痛的患者和21名患有颞下颌疼痛及功能障碍的患者被随机分配到肌电图(EMG)生物反馈治疗、认知行为疗法或保守药物治疗组。治疗后,所有三个治疗组均有改善,其中生物反馈组的变化最为显著。在6个月和24个月的随访中,只有生物反馈组在疼痛严重程度、干扰、情感困扰、与疼痛相关的医疗保健系统使用、受影响肌肉的应激相关反应性方面保持了显著降低,并且积极应对自我陈述有所增加。治疗结果由病程和特定治疗变量预测。失访分析显示治疗师和躯体病理学程度有显著影响。结果表明,患有肌肉骨骼疼痛问题且身体残疾较少的疼痛患者可能从短期EMG生物反馈治疗中获益最大。