• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A single-blind, randomised, comparative study of clarithromycin and amoxycillin suspensions in the treatment of children with lower respiratory tract infections.

作者信息

Macklin J L, James I, Kearsley N J, Coles S J

机构信息

Medical Department, Abbott Laboratories Limited, Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK.

出版信息

J Chemother. 1993 Jun;5(3):174-80. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.1993.11739229.

DOI:10.1080/1120009x.1993.11739229
PMID:8371127
Abstract

One hundred and forty-five children with signs and symptoms of lower respiratory tract infections were entered into this multicentre, General Practice, investigator-blind study, designed to demonstrate equivalent efficacy between clarithromycin and amoxycillin suspensions. Seventy one children were randomised to treatment with clarithromycin suspension 7.5 mg/kg bodyweight twice daily and 74 to treatment with amoxycillin suspension 125 mg (bodyweight < 25 kg) or 250 mg (bodyweight > or = 25 kg) three times a day according to bodyweight. Duration of therapy was 5-10 days as determined by the investigator. Clinical evaluations were performed pretreatment, during treatment and post-treatment within 72 hours of cessation of therapy. Fifty two children in the clarithromycin group and 57 in the amoxycillin group were clinically evaluable. Both study medications were effective and there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to clinical cure rate (60% for clarithromycin and 63% for amoxycillin), clinical success rate (cure plus improvement, 96% for clarithromycin and 95% for amoxycillin) or rate of resolution of clinical signs and symptoms in clinically evaluable patients. The intention to treat analysis for all patients entered similarly showed no significant differences in efficacy. The two treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to incidence or severity of adverse events which were generally mild and associated with the gastrointestinal system. Therapy was withdrawn because of adverse events in three children on clarithromycin and one on amoxycillin. Bacteriological cure rates could not be determined because of an insufficient number of evaluable pre-treatment sputum samples.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

相似文献

1
A single-blind, randomised, comparative study of clarithromycin and amoxycillin suspensions in the treatment of children with lower respiratory tract infections.
J Chemother. 1993 Jun;5(3):174-80. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.1993.11739229.
2
A comparative study of clarithromycin and amoxycillin suspensions in the treatment of pediatric patients with acute otitis media.
Infection. 1993 Jul-Aug;21(4):272-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01728911.
3
Comparison of amoxycillin and clarithromycin as initial treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.阿莫西林与克拉霉素作为社区获得性下呼吸道感染初始治疗药物的比较。
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Jun;46(407):357-60.
4
Clarithromycin vs. amoxicillin suspensions in the treatment of pediatric patients with acute otitis media.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993 Dec;12(12 Suppl 3):S118-21. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199312003-00005.
5
Comparative safety and efficacy of clarithromycin and cefadroxil suspensions in the treatment of mild to moderate skin and skin structure infections in children.克拉霉素和头孢羟氨苄混悬液治疗儿童轻至中度皮肤及皮肤结构感染的安全性和疗效比较
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993 Dec;12(12 Suppl 3):S112-7. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199312003-00004.
6
The comparative efficacy and safety of clarithromycin and amoxycillin in the treatment of outpatients with acute maxillary sinusitis.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Feb;27 Suppl A:83-90. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_a.83.
7
Comparative efficacy of clarithromycin modified-release and clarithromycin immediate-release formulations in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection.克拉霉素缓释制剂与克拉霉素速释制剂治疗下呼吸道感染的疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2001 Apr;23(4):585-95. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80062-x.
8
Comparison of clarithromycin suspension and amoxycillin syrup for the treatment of children with pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis.
Br J Clin Pract. 1997 Apr-May;51(3):133-7.
9
Clarithromycin and cefaclor suspensions in the treatment of acute otitis media in children.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993 Dec;12(12 Suppl 3):S128-33. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199312003-00007.
10
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of clarithromycin and amoxycillin in the treatment of out-patients with acute maxillary sinusitis.克拉霉素与阿莫西林治疗门诊急性上颌窦炎的疗效及耐受性比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 1990;12(1):19-24. doi: 10.1185/03007999009111487.

引用本文的文献

1
In vitro activity and pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic parameters of clarithromycin and azithromycin: why they matter in the treatment of respiratory tract infections.克拉霉素和阿奇霉素的体外活性及药效学/药代动力学参数:它们在呼吸道感染治疗中为何重要。
Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Mar 8;12:585-596. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S187226. eCollection 2019.
2
Clarithromycin. A review of its efficacy in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in immunocompetent patients.克拉霉素。免疫功能正常患者呼吸道感染治疗中其疗效的综述。
Drugs. 1997 Jun;53(6):973-1004. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199753060-00006.