Suppr超能文献

间歇性气动压迫装置对前列腺癌根治术和根治性膀胱切除术术中失血的影响。

The effect of intermittent pneumatic compression devices on intraoperative blood loss during radical prostatectomy and radical cystectomy.

作者信息

Strup S E, Gudziak M, Mulholland S G, Gomella L G

机构信息

Department of Urology, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107.

出版信息

J Urol. 1993 Oct;150(4):1176-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35718-x.

Abstract

Intermittent pneumatic compression devices are a widely used, effective and presumed risk-free method of deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, presumably by increasing peak venous blood velocity, and stimulating local and systemic fibrinolysis. We investigated whether intermittent pneumatic compression devices had any effect on intraoperative blood loss or transfusion during radical pelvic urological surgery. To our knowledge no previous study has addressed these issues. Records were reviewed for patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy or radical cystectomy with diversion from 1985 to 1990. A total of 91 cases was reviewed: 38 radical retropubic prostatectomies and 53 radical cystectomies with diversion (34 male and 19 female patients). There were 59 patients with intermittent pneumatic compression devices (29 radical retropubic prostatectomies and 30 radical cystectomies with diversion) and 32 without intermittent pneumatic compression devices (9 radical retropubic prostatectomies and 23 radical cystectomies with diversion). Intraoperative blood loss and transfusions were calculated for each group with and without intermittent pneumatic compression devices. No clinically apparent lower extremity deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolus was diagnosed in any patient. For the group with intermittent pneumatic compression devices mean intraoperative blood loss was 2,541 ml. (range 700 to 8,850) versus 1,807 ml. (range 450 to 5,100) without a device, for a statistically significant difference of 734 ml. (p = 0.005). When 5 patients with excessive intraoperative blood loss (more than 5,000 ml.) were excluded the statistically significant difference was maintained. When comparing radical retropubic prostatectomy and radical cystectomy with diversion, with and without intermittent pneumatic compression devices, blood loss was greater for the group with a device for each procedure. Differences in intraoperative blood loss were independent of sex or tumor stage. Intraoperative transfusions were increased by approximately 0.6 units per patient with the device. Our study suggests that intermittent pneumatic compression devices may increase blood loss during a radical pelvic operation.

摘要

间歇性气动压迫装置是一种广泛应用的、有效的且被认为无风险的预防深静脉血栓形成的方法,其原理可能是通过提高静脉血流峰值速度以及刺激局部和全身纤维蛋白溶解。我们研究了间歇性气动压迫装置在根治性盆腔泌尿外科手术中对术中失血或输血是否有任何影响。据我们所知,此前尚无研究探讨过这些问题。回顾了1985年至1990年接受耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术或根治性膀胱切除术并进行改道的患者记录。共回顾了91例病例:38例耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术和53例根治性膀胱切除术并进行改道(34例男性和19例女性患者)。其中59例患者使用了间歇性气动压迫装置(29例耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术和30例根治性膀胱切除术并进行改道),32例未使用间歇性气动压迫装置(9例耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术和23例根治性膀胱切除术并进行改道)。计算了使用和未使用间歇性气动压迫装置的每组患者的术中失血量和输血量。所有患者均未诊断出临床上明显的下肢深静脉血栓形成或肺栓塞。使用间歇性气动压迫装置的组术中平均失血量为2541毫升(范围700至8850毫升),未使用该装置的组为1807毫升(范围450至5100毫升),统计学上显著差异为734毫升(p = 0.005)。排除5例术中失血过多(超过5000毫升)的患者后,统计学上的显著差异依然存在。在比较耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术和根治性膀胱切除术并进行改道,使用和未使用间歇性气动压迫装置的情况时,每种手术中使用该装置的组失血量更大。术中失血量的差异与性别或肿瘤分期无关。使用该装置时,术中每位患者的输血量增加约0.6单位。我们的研究表明,间歇性气动压迫装置可能会增加根治性盆腔手术中的失血量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验