Arabin B, Snyjders R, Mohnhaupt A, Ragosch V, Nicolaides K
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Klinikum Steglitz, Free University of Berlin, Germany.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;169(3):549-54. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90618-s.
Our purpose was to define the diagnostic value of a new fetal assessment score that is based on each of the components of the Apgar score.
A fetal assessment score was established to study the main fetal vital functions: (1) cardiovascular (heart rate, color of the skin in the Apgar score), now based on fetal heart rate patterns and Doppler assessment of fetal blood flow redistribution, (2) fetal respiratory (quality of breathing in the Apgar score), now based on Doppler assessment of uteroplacental perfusion, and (3) neuromuscular function (tone and reflexes in the Apgar score), now based on fetal tone and response to external stimuli. The fetal assessment score was used in the study of 110 postdate pregnancies and 103 small-for-gestational-age infants and was compared with the traditional biophysical profile score in the prediction of perinatal outcome.
There were significant associations between both the fetal assessment score and the biophysical profile score with fetal distress that necessitated operative delivery, low Apgar scores, and low umbilical cord arterial blood pH. However, receiver-operator characteristic plots demonstrated that the fetal assessment score was superior to the biophysical profile score in predicting fetal distress and low Apgar values particularly in the small-for-gestational-age infants. The best single parameters in predicting fetal distress were the amniotic fluid volume in the biophysical profile score and fetal heart rate patterns and pulsed Doppler measurements in the new score.
A fetal Apgar score in which respiration is assessed by placental perfusion rather than chest movements and in which skin color is assessed by centralization of fetal blood flow may be better than the traditional biophysical profile score in predicting fetal hypoxic compromise.
我们的目的是确定一种基于阿氏评分各组成部分的新型胎儿评估评分的诊断价值。
建立了一种胎儿评估评分来研究主要的胎儿生命功能:(1)心血管功能(阿氏评分中的心率、皮肤颜色),现在基于胎儿心率模式和胎儿血流再分布的多普勒评估;(2)胎儿呼吸功能(阿氏评分中的呼吸质量),现在基于子宫胎盘灌注的多普勒评估;(3)神经肌肉功能(阿氏评分中的肌张力和反射),现在基于胎儿肌张力和对外部刺激的反应。该胎儿评估评分用于110例过期妊娠和103例小于胎龄儿的研究,并与传统生物物理评分在围产期结局预测方面进行比较。
胎儿评估评分和生物物理评分与需要手术分娩的胎儿窘迫、低阿氏评分和低脐动脉血pH值之间均存在显著相关性。然而,受试者工作特征曲线表明,胎儿评估评分在预测胎儿窘迫和低阿氏值方面优于生物物理评分,尤其是在小于胎龄儿中。预测胎儿窘迫的最佳单一参数在生物物理评分中是羊水量,在新评分中是胎儿心率模式和脉冲多普勒测量值。
一种通过胎盘灌注而非胸部运动评估呼吸、通过胎儿血流集中化评估皮肤颜色的胎儿阿氏评分,在预测胎儿缺氧性损害方面可能优于传统生物物理评分。