Renz B M, Feliciano D V, Sherman R
Joseph B. Whitehead Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ann Surg. 1993 Sep;218(3):279-92; discussion 292-3. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199309000-00007.
The purposes of this project were to study the healing of protected rectal wounds (RWs) using contrast enemas (CEs) and to establish the safety of same admission colostomy closure (SACC) in terms of colostomy closure (CC) and rectal wound-related outcomes, for selected patients with radiologically healed RWs.
Traditional treatment of RWs has included a diverting colostomy that is closed 2 or more months later during a readmission.
All patients admitted with a rectal injury were entered into this prospective study, treated with a diverting colostomy and presacral drainage, and managed according to a postoperative protocol that included a CE per anus to detect healing of the RW. Patients with no leaking on their first CE, no infection, and anal continence underwent SACC.
From 1990 to 1993, 30 consecutive patients had rectal injuries, 90% of which resulted from gunshot wounds. The first CE was performed in 29 patients 5 to 10 days after injury. In this group, 21 patients did not and 8 did have leakage from their RWs. The proportions of RWs radiologically healed at 7 and 10 days after injury were 55.2% and 75%, respectively. Sixteen patients with a normal CE underwent SACC 9 to 19 days after injury (mean, 12.4 days). There were two fecal fistulas (2 of 7; 28.6%) after simple suture closure, none (0 of 9) after resection of the stoma with end-to-end anastomosis, and no RW-related complications after SACC. The mean hospitalization time was 17.4 days.
The following conclusions were drawn: (1) CE confirmed healing of RWs in 75% of patients by 10 days after injury; (2) 60% of patients with RWs were candidates for SACC, and 53% were discharged with their colostomies closed; (3) SACC was performed without complications in 87.5% of patients with radiologically healed RWs; and (4) there were no RW-related complications after SACC.
本项目旨在研究使用对比灌肠法(CE)促进受保护直肠伤口(RW)愈合,并确定对于经放射学检查证实RW已愈合的特定患者,同期回纳结肠造口术(SACC)在结肠造口关闭(CC)及直肠伤口相关结局方面的安全性。
RW的传统治疗方法包括行转流性结肠造口术,在再次入院时于2个月或更长时间后关闭造口。
所有因直肠损伤入院的患者均纳入本前瞻性研究,接受转流性结肠造口术及骶前引流治疗,并按照术后方案进行管理,该方案包括经肛门行CE以检测RW的愈合情况。首次CE检查时无渗漏、无感染且肛门控便功能正常的患者接受SACC。
1990年至1993年,连续30例患者发生直肠损伤,其中90%由枪伤所致。29例患者在受伤后5至10天行首次CE检查。在该组中,21例患者的RW无渗漏,8例有渗漏。受伤后7天和10天经放射学检查证实RW愈合的比例分别为55.2%和75%。16例CE检查结果正常的患者在受伤后9至19天(平均12.4天)接受SACC。单纯缝合关闭造口后发生2例粪瘘(7例中的2例;28.6%),切除造口并行端端吻合术后无粪瘘发生(9例中的0例),SACC后未发生与RW相关的并发症。平均住院时间为17.4天。
得出以下结论:(1)受伤后10天,CE证实75%的患者RW已愈合;(2)60%的RW患者适合行SACC,53%的患者出院时结肠造口已关闭;(3)87.5%经放射学检查证实RW已愈合的患者行SACC时无并发症发生;(4)SACC后未发生与RW相关的并发症。