Li K, Rouleau J L, Calderone A, Andries J L, Brutsaert D L
Department of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1993 May;25(5):529-40. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1993.1063.
Endocardial endothelium has been shown to modulate the contractile characteristics and alpha-1-adrenergic responsiveness of its adjacent myocardium. This study was designed to evaluate whether this was also the case in the pacing-overdrive model of heart failure in the dog, a model in which changes in contractile characteristics and changes in alpha-1-adrenergic responsiveness similar to those caused by endocardial endothelial removal, occur prior to endocardial endothelial removal. Pacing-overdrive heart failure caused a decrease in total tension (TT) (5.1 +/- 0.5 g/mm2 in controls to 2.2 +/- 0.4 g/mm2 in pacing-overdrive, P < 0.01) and twitch configuration (time to 1/2 tension decline [RT1/2] 659 +/- 23 to 517 +/- 41 ms P < 0.01) to occur in isolated papillary muscles. Endocardial endothelial removal in control muscles caused similar but less marked changes (TT to 3.8 +/- 0.3 g/mm2, and RT1/2 to 563 +/- 21 ms). Endocardial endothelium removal also decreased TT (to 1.6 +/- 0.3 g/mm2) and RT1/2 (459 +/- 28 ms) in pacing-overdrive muscles indicating that even in this model of heart failure, endocardial endothelium continued to modulate the contractile characteristics of its adjacent myocardium. The addition of phenylephrine caused proportionately similar changes in contractile characteristics in both control and pacing-overdrive muscles prior to and after endocardial endothelial removal. However, in control muscles, endocardial endothelial removal caused a rightward shift in phenylephrine concentration-response curve (EC50 0.6 +/- 0.2 x 10(-6)M to 3.4 +/- 1.0 x 10(-6)M, P < 0.05). Pacing-overdrive muscles already had a rightward shift (EC50 = 4.1 +/- 1.0 x 10(-6)M) prior to endocardial endothelium removal, such that endocardial endothelial removal caused no further shift in EC50 (2.8 +/- 1.0 x 10(-6)M) indicating that the decrease in alpha-1-adrenergic responsiveness in this model was endocardial endothelium dependent. Taken together, these results suggest that the direct modulating effects of the endocardial endothelium on its adjacent myocardium are not necessarily related to its modulatory role on the myocardial effects of circulating substances in the plasma and, that in heart failure, the decrease in alpha-1-adrenergic responsiveness that occurs is related to endocardial endothelium dysfunction.
心内膜内皮已被证明可调节其相邻心肌的收缩特性和α-1肾上腺素能反应性。本研究旨在评估在犬心力衰竭的起搏超速驱动模型中是否也是如此,在该模型中,在去除心内膜内皮之前,就会出现与心内膜内皮去除所引起的类似的收缩特性变化和α-1肾上腺素能反应性变化。起搏超速驱动导致离体乳头肌的总张力(TT)降低(对照组为5.1±0.5g/mm2,起搏超速驱动组为2.2±0.4g/mm2,P<0.01)以及收缩形态改变(张力下降至1/2的时间[RT1/2]从659±23ms降至517±41ms,P<0.01)。去除对照肌肉的心内膜内皮会引起类似但不太明显的变化(TT降至3.8±0.3g/mm2,RT1/2降至563±21ms)。去除起搏超速驱动肌肉的心内膜内皮也会降低TT(降至1.6±0.3g/mm2)和RT1/2(459±28ms),这表明即使在这种心力衰竭模型中,心内膜内皮仍继续调节其相邻心肌的收缩特性。在内膜内皮去除前后,加入去氧肾上腺素均会使对照肌肉和起搏超速驱动肌肉的收缩特性产生相似比例的变化。然而,在对照肌肉中,去除心内膜内皮会使去氧肾上腺素浓度-反应曲线向右移动(EC50从0.6±0.2×10(-6)M变为3.4±1.0×10(-6)M,P<0.05)。在去除心内膜内皮之前,起搏超速驱动肌肉的曲线已经向右移动(EC50 = 4.1±1.0×10(-6)M),因此去除心内膜内皮不会使EC50进一步移动(2.8±1.0×10(-6)M),这表明该模型中α-1肾上腺素能反应性的降低依赖于心内膜内皮。综上所述,这些结果表明,心内膜内皮对其相邻心肌的直接调节作用不一定与其对血浆中循环物质心肌效应的调节作用相关,并且在心力衰竭中,发生的α-1肾上腺素能反应性降低与心内膜内皮功能障碍有关。