Hudspeth D A, Hansen K J, Reavis S W, Starr S M, Appel R G, Dean R H
Division of Surgical Sciences, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem 27157.
J Vasc Surg. 1993 Sep;18(3):381-8; discussion 389-90. doi: 10.1067/mva.1993.48841.
To define the value of renal duplex sonography (RDS) to detect the presence of critical renal artery (RA) stenosis or occlusion after surgical repair or percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTRA), we retrospectively reviewed our recent 71-month experience.
From January 1987 through November 1992, 272 patients underwent 279 operative RA repairs and 35 patients underwent PTRA. Three hundred twenty-five RDS examinations were performed in 176 patients after operative intervention or PTRA during the study period. Forty-one of these patients had conventional angiography providing 61 RA for RDS comparison, and these data form the basis of this analysis. Twenty-four women and 17 men (mean age 57 years) underwent 44 operative RA repairs or 17 PTRA for correction of atherosclerotic disease (51 arteries) or fibromuscular dysplasia (10 arteries). Before their renovascular procedure each patient had significant hypertension (mean 193/106 mm Hg). RDS after surgery or PTRA was technically complete for all 61 RA.
Compared with angiography RDS correctly identified 47 of 48 repairs with less than 60% RA stenosis , 7 of 11 repairs with 60% to 99% stenosis, and 2 renal artery occlusions, providing a 69% sensitivity rate, 98% specificity rate, 90% positive predictive value, and a 92% negative predictive value. These results were adversely affected by branch RA disease, which accounted for three of four false-negative RDS study results. For 50 kidneys undergoing correction of main RA disease, RDS demonstrated an 89% sensitivity rate, 98% specificity rate, and 96% overall accuracy. RDS results were equivalent for both surgical and PTRA treatment.
From this experience we conclude that RDS is useful for anatomic evaluation after surgical RA repair or PTRA. A negative RDS result excludes stenosis or occlusion of a main RA reconstruction but does not exclude significant branch level disease.
为了确定肾脏双功超声检查(RDS)在检测手术修复或经皮腔内球囊血管成形术(PTRA)后严重肾动脉(RA)狭窄或闭塞情况时的价值,我们回顾了最近71个月的经验。
从1987年1月至1992年11月,272例患者接受了279次肾动脉手术修复,35例患者接受了PTRA。在研究期间,176例患者在手术干预或PTRA后进行了325次RDS检查。其中41例患者进行了传统血管造影,提供了61条肾动脉用于RDS比较,这些数据构成了本分析的基础。24名女性和17名男性(平均年龄57岁)接受了44次肾动脉手术修复或17次PTRA,以纠正动脉粥样硬化疾病(51条动脉)或纤维肌发育异常(10条动脉)。在进行肾血管手术前,每位患者均患有严重高血压(平均193/106 mmHg)。术后或PTRA后的RDS对所有61条肾动脉在技术上均完成检查。
与血管造影相比,RDS正确识别了48例肾动脉狭窄小于60%的修复中的47例,11例狭窄60%至99%的修复中的7例,以及2例肾动脉闭塞,敏感性为69%,特异性为98%,阳性预测值为90%,阴性预测值为92%。这些结果受到肾动脉分支疾病的不利影响,该疾病占RDS假阴性研究结果的四分之三。对于50个接受主肾动脉疾病矫正的肾脏,RDS的敏感性为89%,特异性为98%,总体准确率为96%。RDS结果在手术和PTRA治疗中相当。
根据这一经验,我们得出结论,RDS有助于手术修复肾动脉或PTRA后的解剖学评估。RDS结果为阴性可排除主肾动脉重建的狭窄或闭塞,但不能排除严重的分支水平疾病。