• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The parental paradox.

作者信息

van Nijnatten C

机构信息

Department of General Social Sciences, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Law. 1993;12(1-2):15-23.

PMID:8377608
Abstract

Parenthood is in turmoil: On the one hand many of the parental tasks have been taken over by social institutions and on the other psychological aspects of the parent-child relation are emphasized. We see three important developments: The relationship between parents and children has been democratized, the psychological and juridical position has been acknowledged and the social check on parental behaviour has changed dramatically. In this dynamic field, children's rights have risen as a new way of solving family problems. Rights for children create new possibilities for recognizing the growing independence of children. But these may reinforce individualistic developments and a laissez-faire attitude towards children. If personal interests are the primary goals of relations, children as vulnerable subjects will be more at risk.

摘要

相似文献

1
The parental paradox.
Med Law. 1993;12(1-2):15-23.
2
Evaluating the best interests of the child--a model of multidisciplinary teamwork.评估儿童的最大利益——一种多学科团队合作模式
Med Law. 1993;12(3-5):205-11.
3
Getting beyond "what did she do to provoke him?": comments by a retired judge on the special issue on child custody and domestic violence.
Violence Against Women. 2008 Jan;14(1):93-9. doi: 10.1177/1077801207311866.
4
Sexual abuse allegations in child custody disputes.儿童监护权纠纷中的性虐待指控。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1991;14(3):269-86. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(91)90008-b.
5
Indian Family Exception Doctrine: still losing children despite the Indian Child Welfare Act.印第安家庭例外原则:尽管有《印第安儿童福利法》,儿童仍在流失。
Child Welfare. 2006 Jul-Aug;85(4):671-90.
6
Parental kidnapping.父母绑架(罪)
J Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 1983 May;22(3):279-85. doi: 10.1016/s0002-7138(09)60378-2.
7
Psychological and judicial parenthood.心理层面的父母身份与法律层面的父母身份。
Med Law. 1990;9(4):1070-6.
8
[On the work of Austrian authorised experts on procedures in custodial and visiting rights--a survey of current practice from the parents and children view].[关于奥地利监护权和探视权程序方面的授权专家工作——从父母和子女视角对当前实践的调查]
Neuropsychiatr. 2008;22(4):268-76.
9
Child custody decisions in families experiencing woman abuse.
Soc Work. 1994 Jan;39(1):51-9.
10
[Using attachment measures in the context of providing expert witness through psychiatric assessment in family court proceedings].[在家庭法庭诉讼中通过精神病学评估提供专家证人的背景下使用依恋测量方法]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2012;61(4):255-70. doi: 10.13109/prkk.2012.61.4.255.