Suppr超能文献

[地高辛与利尿剂治疗慢性左心衰竭伴窦性心律的临床疗效比较]

[Comparison of the clinical effect between digoxin and a diuretic in chronic left heart failure and sinus rhythm].

作者信息

Vöhringer H F, Schüren K P

机构信息

Innere Abteilung im Auguste-Viktoria-Krankenhaus, Berlin.

出版信息

Med Klin (Munich). 1993 Jul 15;88(7):410-6.

PMID:8377718
Abstract

Because of conflicting results from studies examining the initial treatment of patients with chronic left heart failure (CHF) and sinus rhythm, the clinical efficacy and safety of digoxin and a diuretic were compared in a multicenter, randomised, open twelve-week study. 47 patients with CHF (NYHA II and III) were treated either with digoxin or a combination of hydrochlorothiazide and triamterene. Three patients from the diuretic group and four from the digoxin group required premature termination of study periods because of increasing symptoms of CHF. Both regimens decreased significantly a heart failure score and increased distinctly the symptom-limited exercise tolerance, but results did not differ between the groups. Echocardiographic parameters, ejection fraction and radionuclide indices of diastolic function estimated by gated blood pool scan did not change with either treatment. It was concluded that digoxin or the diuretic therapy alone was effective in ameliorating the clinical signs of CHF. Due to missing differences in the clinical efficacy of both drugs an individual and not schematic treatment regimen of CHF is warranted.

摘要

由于在对慢性左心衰竭(CHF)和窦性心律患者初始治疗的研究中结果相互矛盾,因此在一项多中心、随机、开放的为期12周的研究中比较了地高辛和利尿剂的临床疗效及安全性。47例CHF(纽约心脏协会II级和III级)患者接受了地高辛治疗或氢氯噻嗪与氨苯蝶啶联合治疗。利尿剂组有3例患者、地高辛组有4例患者因CHF症状加重而需要提前终止研究期。两种治疗方案均显著降低了心力衰竭评分,并明显提高了症状限制运动耐量,但两组结果无差异。超声心动图参数、射血分数以及通过门控血池扫描估计的舒张功能放射性核素指标在两种治疗中均未改变。得出的结论是,单独使用地高辛或利尿剂治疗在改善CHF临床体征方面有效。由于两种药物临床疗效无差异,因此有必要采用个体化而非模式化的CHF治疗方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验