Maden C, Sherman K J, Beckmann A M, Hislop T G, Teh C Z, Ashley R L, Daling J R
Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Wash.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Jan 6;85(1):19-24. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.1.19.
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological evidence suggests lack of neonatal circumcision as the strongest risk factor for penile cancer, but the role of sexually transmitted diseases in the etiology of penile cancer has remained unclear. PURPOSE: To further clarify risk factors for penile cancer, we examined the role of circumcision, personal characteristics and habits (such as smoking), sexually transmitted diseases, past sexual activity, and medical conditions of the penis. METHODS: A population-based, case-control study was conducted in western Washington state and in the province of British Columbia. We interviewed 110 men with penile cancer diagnosed from January 1979 to July 1990 and 355 control subjects from the general population, frequency matched to case subjects on age and date of diagnosis. Tumor tissue from 67 case subjects was tested for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA by polymerase chain reaction. Results of blood tests from 69 case subjects and 208 control subjects were available for study. STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT RESULTS: Relative to men circumcised at birth, the risk for penile cancer was 3.2 times greater among men who were never circumcised and 3.0 times greater among men who were circumcised after the neonatal period. For current smokers, the risk was 2.8 times that of men who never smoked. The risk among men reporting a history of genital warts was 5.9 times that of men reporting no such history. Of 67 tumors tested for HPV DNA, 49% were positive; the majority of these positive tumors (70%) were type 16, which has been associated with anogenital carcinoma. Relative risks (RRs) associated with a reported history of penile rash or penile tear were 9.4 and 3.9, respectively. Among men not circumcised at birth, RRs associated with presence of smegma and difficulty in retracting the foreskin were 2.1 and 3.5, respectively. Twenty-eight percent of case subjects, compared with only 10% of control subjects, reported 30 or more sexual partners, and men with HPV-positive tumors were more likely to report a greater number of sexual partners. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the absence of neonatal circumcision and potential resulting complications are associated with penile cancer. Additionally, medical conditions of the penis, sexual activity, infection with HPV, and smoking may increase the risk for penile cancer. IMPLICATIONS: A larger study would allow examination of interrelationships of circumcision, infection with HPV, and smoking as risk factors.
背景:流行病学证据表明,未进行新生儿包皮环切术是阴茎癌最主要的危险因素,但性传播疾病在阴茎癌病因学中的作用仍不明确。 目的:为进一步阐明阴茎癌的危险因素,我们研究了包皮环切术、个人特征与习惯(如吸烟)、性传播疾病、既往性行为以及阴茎的健康状况所起的作用。 方法:在华盛顿州西部和不列颠哥伦比亚省开展了一项基于人群的病例对照研究。我们对1979年1月至1990年7月期间确诊为阴茎癌的110名男性以及355名来自普通人群的对照者进行了访谈,对照者在年龄和诊断日期上与病例组进行频数匹配。采用聚合酶链反应对67例病例的肿瘤组织进行人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA检测。获取了69例病例和208名对照者的血液检测结果用于研究。统计学显著结果:与出生时即接受包皮环切术的男性相比,从未接受过包皮环切术的男性患阴茎癌的风险高3.2倍,新生儿期后接受包皮环切术的男性患阴茎癌的风险高3.0倍。对于当前吸烟者,其风险是从不吸烟男性的2.8倍。报告有生殖器疣病史的男性的风险是无此病史男性的5.9倍。在检测HPV DNA的67个肿瘤中,49%呈阳性;这些阳性肿瘤中的大多数(70%)为16型,该型与肛门生殖器癌有关。报告有阴茎皮疹或阴茎撕裂病史的相对风险(RRs)分别为9.4和3.9。在出生时未接受包皮环切术的男性中,与存在包皮垢和包皮上翻困难相关的RRs分别为2.1和3.5。28%的病例报告有30个或更多性伴侣,而对照者中只有10%如此,且HPV阳性肿瘤的男性更有可能报告有更多性伴侣。 结论:这些结果表明,未进行新生儿包皮环切术及可能由此引发的并发症与阴茎癌有关。此外,阴茎的健康状况、性行为、HPV感染和吸烟可能会增加患阴茎癌的风险。 启示:一项规模更大的研究将有助于考察包皮环切术、HPV感染和吸烟作为危险因素之间的相互关系。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993-1-6
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2000
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008-10
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993-1-6
Front Oncol. 2024-5-22
Health Psychol Res. 2022-8-20
Cancers (Basel). 2022-6-21
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022-7-6
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2021
Nat Rev Urol. 2022-4