Bakri Y N, Subhi J, Amer M, Ezzat A, Sinner W, Tweijry A, Jabbar F A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Gynecol Oncol. 1993 Jan;48(1):110-3. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1017.
A retrospective study was conducted to determine if a chemotherapy regimen incorporating cis-platinum, etoposide, and actinomycin D (PEA) was associated with an outcome different from that of the standard triple regimen of methotrexate, actinomycin D, and chlorambucil (MAC) in patients with gestational trophoblastic tumor and liver metastases. Subjects were treated at the King Faisal Specialist Hospital Gestational Trophoblastic Center (KFSH-GTC) between January 1980 and December 1990. Of 19 patients with gestational trophoblastic tumor and liver metastases, 6 received MAC chemotherapy, and 8 received PEA. Five patients were terminally ill and received palliative treatment only. Treatment outcome was measured by beta-subunit human chorionic gonadotropin assay (beta-HCG) and by imaging studies which included ultrasound, computerized axial tomography, and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Durable remission was obtained in 5 of 8 (62.5%) PEA-treated patients and none of 6 MAC-treated patients. There was no difference in risk status or World Health Organization (WHO) prognostic score between the two groups. We conclude that PEA is a relatively effective chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of gestational trophoblastic tumor with liver metastases, and it may be worthy of consideration for prospective clinical trials.
进行了一项回顾性研究,以确定在妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤伴肝转移患者中,包含顺铂、依托泊苷和放线菌素D的化疗方案(PEA)与甲氨蝶呤、放线菌素D和苯丁酸氮芥的标准三联方案(MAC)相比,其治疗结果是否不同。研究对象于1980年1月至1990年12月在法赫德国王专科医院妊娠滋养细胞中心(KFSH-GTC)接受治疗。在19例妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤伴肝转移患者中,6例接受MAC化疗,8例接受PEA化疗。5例患者处于终末期,仅接受了姑息治疗。通过β-亚单位人绒毛膜促性腺激素检测(β-HCG)以及包括超声、计算机断层扫描和/或磁共振成像在内的影像学检查来衡量治疗结果。接受PEA治疗的8例患者中有5例(62.5%)获得了持久缓解,而接受MAC治疗的6例患者均未获得持久缓解。两组之间的风险状态或世界卫生组织(WHO)预后评分没有差异。我们得出结论,PEA是治疗妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤伴肝转移的一种相对有效的化疗方案,可能值得考虑用于前瞻性临床试验。