Suppr超能文献

细菌和小鼠乳腺肿瘤病毒超抗原:具有相同功能的两个不同蛋白质家族。

The bacterial and mouse mammary tumor virus superantigens; two different families of proteins with the same functions.

作者信息

Marrack P, Winslow G M, Choi Y, Scherer M, Pullen A, White J, Kappler J W

机构信息

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, National Jewish Center for Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Denver, CO.

出版信息

Immunol Rev. 1993 Feb;131:79-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1993.tb01531.x.

Abstract

In conclusion, the bacterial toxins are completely unlike the MTV superantigens in primary sequence and structure. The former are soluble globular proteins which do not have to be proteolytically cleaved before they act. The latter are synthesized as type II membrane proteins and may be clipped before they reach the cell surface and act to stimulate T cells. Table III summarizes the similarities and differences between the two sets of superantigens. The most notable quality of these molecules is that both sets of families have developed strategies whereby they bind to Class II and engage V beta. As far as the microorganisms which produce them are concerned, these two properties appear to be essential since they are absolutely conserved over proteins of a number of different structures. Several questions can now be addressed as follows. a. Why do all known superantigens bind to Class II? For the microorganism which produces them, the function of superantigens appears to be T-cell and perhaps directly or indirectly B-cell and macrophage stimulation. Activation of virgin T cells requires engagement with antigen plus MHC on professional antigen-presenting cells. Unlike other cell surface proteins, for example Class I, most Class II in animals is expressed on such cells. Therefore it is likely that superantigens have evolved to engage Class II because presentation to T cells by Class II-bearing cells offers the superantigen the best chance of activating its target T cells. b. Why do superantigens engage TCR V beta and not V alpha or CD3? It is possible that superantigens bind to the V beta portion of the TCR rather than V alpha because the latter does not have a consistently well exposed face for engagement. The fact that it is perhaps relatively easier to produce anti-V beta rather than anti-V alpha antibodies supports this idea. We have shown that N-glycosylation of V beta can interfere with recognition by vSAGs (Pullen et al. 1991), perhaps glycosylation of V alpha tends to conceal otherwise available sites. As far as C beta, C alpha or CD3 engagement is concerned, this may be just too dangerous for MTVs. The role of MTVs SAgs in the life history of the virus seems to be to stimulate T cells in the suckling recipient and thereby create a pool of activated lymphocytes in which the virus may survive until the mouse gives birth and transmits the virus to her own progeny (Hainaut et al. 1990, Golovkina et al. 1992).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

总之,细菌毒素在一级序列和结构上与MTV超抗原完全不同。前者是可溶性球状蛋白,在发挥作用前无需进行蛋白水解切割。后者作为II型膜蛋白合成,在到达细胞表面并刺激T细胞之前可能会被剪切。表III总结了两组超抗原之间的异同。这些分子最显著的特点是两组家族都形成了与II类分子结合并与Vβ相互作用的策略。就产生它们的微生物而言,这两个特性似乎至关重要,因为它们在许多不同结构的蛋白质中绝对保守。现在可以提出几个问题如下。a. 为什么所有已知的超抗原都与II类分子结合?对于产生它们的微生物来说,超抗原的功能似乎是刺激T细胞,也许直接或间接刺激B细胞和巨噬细胞。未成熟T细胞的激活需要与专职抗原呈递细胞上的抗原加MHC相互作用。与其他细胞表面蛋白不同,例如I类分子,动物体内的大多数II类分子在这类细胞上表达。因此,超抗原可能进化为与II类分子相互作用,因为由携带II类分子的细胞将其呈递给T细胞为超抗原提供了激活其靶T细胞的最佳机会。b. 为什么超抗原与TCR Vβ相互作用而不是Vα或CD3?超抗原可能与TCR的Vβ部分结合而不是Vα,原因可能是后者没有始终良好暴露的表面用于相互作用。相对而言,产生抗Vβ抗体可能比产生抗Vα抗体更容易,这一事实支持了这一观点。我们已经表明Vβ的N-糖基化可以干扰vSAGs的识别(Pullen等人,1991年),也许Vα的糖基化倾向于掩盖其他可用位点。就与Cβ、Cα或CD3的相互作用而言,这对MTV来说可能太危险了。MTV SAgs在病毒生命历程中的作用似乎是刺激哺乳期受体中的T细胞,从而产生一群活化的淋巴细胞,病毒可能在其中存活,直到小鼠分娩并将病毒传播给其后代(Hainaut等人,1990年,Golovkina等人,1992年)。(摘要截取自400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验