Suppr超能文献

源自大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的嵌合蜜二糖载体中的阳离子偶联。氨基末端部分对于蜜二糖转运中Na+的识别至关重要。

Cation-coupling in chimeric melibiose carriers derived from Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The amino-terminal portion is crucial for Na+ recognition in melibiose transport.

作者信息

Hama H, Wilson T H

机构信息

Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.

出版信息

J Biol Chem. 1993 May 15;268(14):10060-5.

PMID:8387512
Abstract

The melibiose carrier of Escherichia coli couples sugar transport to H+, Na+, and Li+, while that of Klebsiella pneumoniae utilizes only H+ and Li+. We made five chimeric carriers derived from the two carriers to identify the region(s) involved in Na+ recognition. The chimeric carriers E2K10, E4K8, E6K6, E8K4, and E10K2 have the amino-terminal 77, 144, 197, 298, and 349 amino acid residues derived from E. coli and the rest derived from K. pneumoniae, respectively. Melibiose accumulation through the chimeric carriers E2K10, E4K8, and E6K6 was strongly stimulated by Na+ and Li+ as is the case with the E. coli carrier. On the other hand, there was very little stimulation with the carriers E8K4 and E10K2. These results suggest that, 1) the amino-terminal 77 amino acids of the E. coli carrier, which has 5 different and 4 fewer amino acids than the K. pneumoniae carrier, have a crucial role in Na+ recognition in melibiose transport and 2) the carboxyl-terminal half of the carrier also forms a part of the Na+ recognition site which may be distorted in chimeric structures. In contrast with melibiose accumulation, there was very little Na+ stimulation of TMG (methyl-1-thio-beta-D-galactopyranoside) transport and no Na+ stimulation was observed in lactose transport with any of the chimeric carriers, whereas in E. coli Na+ stimulates TMG and lactose transport. These results suggest that there is no universal Na+ recognition site for all the sugar substrates. Instead different parts of the carrier seem to participate in cation recognition for different sugar substrates.

摘要

大肠杆菌的蜜二糖载体可将糖转运与H⁺、Na⁺和Li⁺偶联,而肺炎克雷伯菌的蜜二糖载体仅利用H⁺和Li⁺。我们从这两种载体构建了五个嵌合载体,以确定参与Na⁺识别的区域。嵌合载体E2K10、E4K8、E6K6、E8K4和E10K2分别具有源自大肠杆菌的氨基末端77、144、197、298和349个氨基酸残基,其余部分源自肺炎克雷伯菌。通过嵌合载体E2K10、E4K8和E6K6的蜜二糖积累受到Na⁺和Li⁺的强烈刺激,就像大肠杆菌载体的情况一样。另一方面,载体E8K4和E10K2的刺激作用非常小。这些结果表明,1)大肠杆菌载体的氨基末端77个氨基酸,比肺炎克雷伯菌载体少5个且不同的氨基酸,在蜜二糖转运的Na⁺识别中起关键作用;2)载体的羧基末端一半也构成Na⁺识别位点的一部分,该位点在嵌合结构中可能会变形。与蜜二糖积累相反,Na⁺对TMG(甲基-1-硫代-β-D-吡喃半乳糖苷)转运的刺激作用非常小,并且在任何嵌合载体的乳糖转运中均未观察到Na⁺刺激,而在大肠杆菌中Na⁺刺激TMG和乳糖转运。这些结果表明,对于所有糖底物不存在通用的Na⁺识别位点。相反,载体的不同部分似乎参与了不同糖底物的阳离子识别。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验