Kho H G, Kloppenborg P W, van Egmond J
Institute for Anesthesiology, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1993 May;10(3):197-208.
The effects of acupuncture and transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) on plasma adrenaline (A) and noradrenaline (NA), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), beta-endorphin (beta E), anti-diuretic hormone (ADH) and hydrocortisone (cortisol) were evaluated during and, for four days after surgery in 42 male patients submitted to a standardized major abdominal operation in a comparative study of three different anaesthetic techniques. Group 1 received acupuncture and transcutaneous stimulation as the main non-pharmacological analgesic during surgery. Group 2 received moderate-dose fentanyl (initial bolus of 10 micrograms kg-1 followed by continuous infusion of 5 micrograms kg-1 h-1 for the first hour, and then 4 micrograms kg-1 h-1. Group 3 received a combination of both methods. In all three groups analgesia was supplemented, if necessary, by small bolus injections of 50 micrograms fentanyl. Anaesthesia was induced in all groups with thiopentone 5 mg kg-1 and vecuronium 0.1 mg kg-1 and patients were ventilated (N2O:O2 = 2:1) to achieve normocapnia without the use of a halogenated agent. Pre-operatively acupuncture plus TES in Groups 1 and 3 led to a rise in beta E (P < 0.05) without changes of haemodynamics. After intubation beta E did not increase further. Intubation in Group 2 led to an increase of beta E (P < 0.05) also, and to a rise in pulse rate and blood pressure (P < 0.05) in all three groups. Per-operatively acupuncture plus TES in Group 1 showed a response of circulating NA and cortisol similar to that in Groups 2 and 3, whereas the responses of the circulating A, ACTH, beta E and ADH in Group 1 were more pronounced (P < 0.01). Post-operatively no differences in the hormonal profiles could be discerned between the groups with or without acupuncture plus TES (Group 2 vs. Group 3) nor between those with or without moderate-dose fentanyl anaesthesia (Group 1 vs. Group 3). It is concluded that acupuncture and TES have no effect on the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and intubation. They can replace moderate-dose fentanyl anaesthesia in major abdominal surgery at the cost of a more enhanced per-operative neuroendocrine stress response, which does not, however, influence the postoperative hormonal profiles nor the rapidity of return to pre-operative values.
在一项针对三种不同麻醉技术的比较研究中,对42例接受标准化腹部大手术的男性患者,评估了手术期间及术后四天内针刺和经皮电刺激(TES)对血浆肾上腺素(A)、去甲肾上腺素(NA)、促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)、β-内啡肽(βE)、抗利尿激素(ADH)和氢化可的松(皮质醇)的影响。第1组在手术期间接受针刺和经皮刺激作为主要的非药物镇痛方法。第2组接受中等剂量芬太尼(初始推注10微克/千克,随后第1小时持续输注5微克/千克·小时,然后4微克/千克·小时)。第3组接受两种方法的联合使用。在所有三组中,必要时通过小剂量推注50微克芬太尼补充镇痛。所有组均用5毫克/千克硫喷妥钠和0.1毫克/千克维库溴铵诱导麻醉,患者进行通气(N2O:O2 = 2:1)以实现正常碳酸血症,不使用卤化剂。术前第1组和第3组的针刺加TES导致βE升高(P < 0.05),血流动力学无变化。插管后βE未进一步增加。第2组的插管也导致βE升高(P < 0.05),并且三组的心率和血压均升高(P < 0.05)。术中第1组的针刺加TES显示循环NA和皮质醇的反应与第2组和第3组相似,而第1组中循环A、ACTH、βE和ADH的反应更明显(P < 0.01)。术后,在有或没有针刺加TES的组(第2组与第3组)之间以及有或没有中等剂量芬太尼麻醉的组(第1组与第3组)之间,未发现激素谱有差异。得出的结论是,针刺和TES对喉镜检查和插管的心血管反应没有影响。它们可以在腹部大手术中替代中等剂量芬太尼麻醉,但代价是术中神经内分泌应激反应增强,然而这并不影响术后激素谱,也不影响恢复到术前值的速度。