• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卡托普利与赖诺普利治疗轻至中度动脉高血压的对照多中心比较

Controlled multicentre comparison of captopril versus lisinopril in the treatment of mild-to-moderate arterial hypertension.

作者信息

Rumboldt Z, Simunić M, Bagatin J, Rumboldt M, Marinković M, Janezić A

机构信息

Clinical Hospital Centre Split, Department of Medicine, Croatia.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1993;13(1):35-41.

PMID:8389738
Abstract

The antihypertensive efficacy and safety of lisinopril (L), a novel ACE inhibitor, were compared to those of captopril (C), the familiar drug of the same class, in a multicentre controlled trial. The study included 91 mild-to-moderate, middle-aged hypertensives of both genders, 46 of which were randomized to C and 45 to L. After a two-week placebo period the examinees were receiving either L o.d. in increasing dosage of 10, 20, or 40 mg per day (amount necessary to achieve normotension), or C b.i.d. in a corresponding daily dose of 25, 50, or 100 mg. During the eight-week formal part of the trial, L decreased the systolic blood pressure from the initial values by an average of 14.9%, and the diastolic pressure by some 15.2%. The same parameters were lowered on C by 11.2%, and 11.7%, respectively. The mean arterial pressure from an initial average of 125.5 mmHg was lowered to 110.9 mmHg on C (11.6% reduction, p < 0.01), and from 125.3 mmHg to 108.2 mmHg on L (13.6% reduction, p < 0.01). Although the L effects were more pronounced, the observed between-group differences did not reach the level of statistical significance, except for the achievement of normotension, which disclosed the superiority of L (p < 0.05). The tolerability of both drugs was good and only one examinee had to be excluded because of side-effects (proteinuria). It is concluded that both ACEIs under study showed comparable efficacy and safety, L being marginally more potent and longer acting.

摘要

在一项多中心对照试验中,将新型血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂赖诺普利(L)与同一类的常用药物卡托普利(C)的降压疗效及安全性进行了比较。该研究纳入了91例轻至中度、中年的男女高血压患者,其中46例随机分配至C组,45例分配至L组。经过两周的安慰剂期后,受试者分别接受L每日一次,剂量递增至10、20或40毫克/天(达到血压正常所需剂量),或C每日两次,相应日剂量为25、50或100毫克。在试验的八周正式阶段,L使收缩压从初始值平均降低了14.9%,舒张压降低了约15.2%。C使相同参数分别降低了11.2%和11.7%。平均动脉压从初始平均125.5 mmHg在C组降至110.9 mmHg(降低11.6%,p<0.01),在L组从125.3 mmHg降至108.2 mmHg(降低13.6%,p<0.01)。尽管L的效果更显著,但观察到的组间差异未达到统计学显著水平,除了血压正常这一指标显示L具有优越性(p<0.05)。两种药物的耐受性都良好,只有一名受试者因副作用(蛋白尿)被排除。结论是,所研究的两种ACE抑制剂显示出相当的疗效和安全性,L的效力略强且作用时间更长。

相似文献

1
Controlled multicentre comparison of captopril versus lisinopril in the treatment of mild-to-moderate arterial hypertension.卡托普利与赖诺普利治疗轻至中度动脉高血压的对照多中心比较
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1993;13(1):35-41.
2
[Comparison of captopril and lisinopril in the treatment of mild and moderate hypertension].卡托普利与赖诺普利治疗轻、中度高血压的比较
Lijec Vjesn. 1991 Mar-Apr;113(3-4):89-92.
3
Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of the combination delapril plus indapamide in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension: a randomised, multicentre, controlled study.评估地拉普利联合吲达帕胺治疗轻至中度原发性高血压的疗效和耐受性:一项随机、多中心、对照研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Feb;17(2):139-46. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001514.
4
Enalapril versus captopril: a double-blind multicentre comparison in essential hypertension.依那普利与卡托普利对比:原发性高血压的双盲多中心比较
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1988;8(3):181-8.
5
Shifting trends in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: a real-world evaluation of the efficacy, safety, rationality and pharmaco-economics of old and newer antihypertensive drugs.尼日利亚一家三级医院高血压药物治疗的趋势变化:对新旧抗高血压药物的疗效、安全性、合理性和药物经济学的真实世界评估
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Apr;17(4):277-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001538.
6
Treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension with calcium channel blockers: a multicentre comparison of once-daily nifedipine GITS with once-daily amlodipine.钙通道阻滞剂治疗轻至中度高血压:一日一次硝苯地平控释片与一日一次氨氯地平的多中心比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(3):226-37. doi: 10.1185/030079903125001677.
7
Lisinopril in the treatment of hypertension: a Canadian postmarketing surveillance study.赖诺普利治疗高血压:一项加拿大上市后监测研究。
Clin Ther. 1993 Mar-Apr;15(2):407-22.
8
Comparison of benazepril-amlodipine and captopril-thiazide combinations in the management of mild-to-moderate hypertension.贝那普利-氨氯地平与卡托普利-噻嗪类联合用药治疗轻至中度高血压的比较。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Jun;40(6):263-9.
9
[Ambulatory monitoring of arterial pressure in the treatment of mild-moderate arterial hypertension with lisinopril vs. enalapril].赖诺普利与依那普利治疗轻中度动脉高血压时的动态血压监测
Arch Inst Cardiol Mex. 1997 Jan-Feb;67(1):29-37.
10
[Nebivolol, a third generation beta blocker: the modern treatment of hypertension. Results of a multicentric observational study].奈必洛尔,第三代β受体阻滞剂:高血压的现代治疗。一项多中心观察性研究的结果
Fortschr Med Orig. 2000 Jul 27;118 Suppl 2:77-82.