Ferrari M D, Saxena P R
Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1993 Apr;14(4):129-33. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(93)90084-w.
Recent reviews on the mode of action of the anti-migraine drug sumatriptan arrived at contrasting conclusions. Whereas some reviewers concluded that vasoconstriction is the most important action, others suggest that neuronal inhibition is essential. Both views were based predominantly on animal or in vitro experiments. In this comment, Michel Ferrari and Pramod Saxena review the experimental effects of sumatriptan in humans and discuss the clinical validity of both theories. In addition, they examine the initial efficacy of treatment and the mechanism of recurrence of headache within 24 hours, which is the most important drawback of sumatriptan in clinical practice, next to its possible cardiac side effects.
近期关于抗偏头痛药物舒马曲坦作用机制的综述得出了相互矛盾的结论。一些综述作者认为血管收缩是最重要的作用,而另一些人则认为神经元抑制至关重要。这两种观点主要都基于动物实验或体外实验。在这篇评论中,米歇尔·法拉利和普拉莫德·萨克塞纳回顾了舒马曲坦在人体中的实验效果,并讨论了这两种理论的临床有效性。此外,他们还研究了治疗的初始疗效以及24小时内头痛复发的机制,这是舒马曲坦在临床实践中最重要的缺点,仅次于其可能的心脏副作用。