González Barón M, Artal A, Garrido P, García Girón C, Ordóñez A, Feliu J, Berrocal A, Barón J M
Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Am J Clin Oncol. 1993 Aug;16(4):310-4. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199308000-00006.
Two chemotherapy regimens for advanced NSCLC given on an outpatient basis were evaluated in a prospective phase II trial: mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (MIP) vs vindesine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VIP). This study included 100 patients. Prognostic factors were well balanced between the arms. Objective response rates (CR: MIP 0%, VIP 4%; PR: MIP 24%, VIP 18%) and survival (median time: 7 months in both arms) were in the standard range usually reported. Subjective and symptomatic improvement have been assessed. Toxicity was moderate, manageable, and mostly reversible. We believe that investigation for new ambulatory schemes must continue.
在一项前瞻性II期试验中,对两种门诊使用的晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗方案进行了评估:丝裂霉素、异环磷酰胺和顺铂(MIP)与长春地辛、异环磷酰胺和顺铂(VIP)。本研究纳入了100例患者。两组之间的预后因素平衡良好。客观缓解率(完全缓解:MIP为0%,VIP为4%;部分缓解:MIP为24%,VIP为18%)和生存率(中位时间:两组均为7个月)处于通常报道的标准范围内。已对主观和症状改善情况进行了评估。毒性为中度,可控且大多可逆。我们认为必须继续探索新的门诊治疗方案。