Yang D P, Mavromoustakos T, Makriyannis A
School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269.
Life Sci. 1993;53(7):PL117-22. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(93)90718-i.
Small angle X-ray diffraction was used to study the topography of (-)-delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 8-THC) and its pharmacologically inactive methoxy analog (-)-O-methyl-delta 8-tetrahydrocannabinol (Me-delta 8-THC) in a membrane. The membrane preparations were partially hydrated dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) bilayers. Comparisons between electron density profiles from the drug-containing and drug-free membranes showed that the amphipathic delta 8-THC residues near the interface of the bilayer where the polar phenolic OH of the drug molecule is oriented towards the corresponding polar side of the phospholipid bilayer. Conversely, the highly hydrophobic Me-delta 8-THC distributes deeper in the bilayer away from the interface. Our results point out these two structurally-related, but pharmacologically very different, cannabinoids interact with membranes in strikingly different manners. This observation may, in part, explain the different pharmacological properties of the two cannabinoids.
采用小角X射线衍射研究了(-)-δ8-四氢大麻酚(δ8-THC)及其药理惰性的甲氧基类似物(-)-O-甲基-δ8-四氢大麻酚(Me-δ8-THC)在膜中的拓扑结构。膜制剂为部分水合的二肉豆蔻酰磷脂酰胆碱(DMPC)双层膜。含药膜和不含药膜的电子密度分布比较表明,两亲性的δ8-THC残基位于双层膜界面附近,药物分子的极性酚羟基朝向磷脂双层膜的相应极性侧。相反,高度疏水的Me-δ8-THC在双层膜中远离界面的位置分布更深。我们的结果指出,这两种结构相关但药理性质差异很大的大麻素与膜的相互作用方式截然不同。这一观察结果可能部分解释了这两种大麻素不同的药理特性。