Krishtalik L I, Tae G S, Cherepanov D A, Cramer W A
Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Biophys J. 1993 Jul;65(1):184-95. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81050-6.
The effect of the dipole potential field of extended membrane spanning alpha-helices on the redox potentials of b cytochromes in energy transducing membranes has been calculated in the context of a three phase model for the membrane. In this model, the membrane contains three dielectric layers; (i) a 40-A hydrophobic membrane bilayer, with dielectric constant em = 3-4, (ii) 10-20-A interfacial layers of intermediate polarity, ein = 12-20, that consist of lipid polar head groups and peripheral protein segments, and (iii) an external infinite water medium, ew = 80. The unusually positive midpoint potential, Em = +0.4 V, of the "high potential" cytochrome b-559 of oxygenic photosynthetic membranes, a previously enigmatic property of this cytochrome, can be explained by (i) the position of the heme in the positive dipole potential region near the NH2 termini of the two parallel helices that provide its histidine ligands, and (ii) the loss of solvation energy of the heme ion due to the low dielectric constant of its surroundings, leading to an estimate of +0.31 to +0.37 V for the cytochrome Em. The known tendency of this cytochrome to undergo a large -delta Em shift upon exposure of thylakoid membranes to proteases or damaging treatments is explained by disruption of the intermediate polarity (ein) surface dielectric layer and the resulting contact of the heme with the external water medium. Application of this model to the two hemes (bn and bp) of cytochrome b of the cytochrome bc1 complex, with the two hemes placed symmetrically in the low dielectric (em) membrane bilayer, results in Em values of hemes bn and bp that are, respectively, somewhat too negative (approximately -0.1 V), and much too positive (approximately +0.3 V), leading to a potential difference, Em(bp) - Em(bn), with the wrong sign and magnitude, +0.25 V instead of -0.10 to -0.15 V. The heme potentials can only be approximately reconciled with experiment, if it is assumed that the two hemes are in different dielectric environments, with that of heme bp being more polar.
在膜的三相模型背景下,计算了跨膜延伸α-螺旋的偶极势场对能量转换膜中b型细胞色素氧化还原电位的影响。在该模型中,膜包含三个介电层:(i) 一个40埃的疏水膜双层,介电常数em = 3 - 4;(ii) 10 - 20埃的中等极性界面层,ein = 12 - 20,由脂质极性头部基团和外周蛋白片段组成;(iii) 外部无限水介质,ew = 80。产氧光合膜的“高电位”细胞色素b - 559异常正的中点电位Em = +0.4 V,这一细胞色素以前难以解释的特性可以通过以下方式解释:(i) 血红素位于两个平行螺旋NH2末端附近的正偶极势区域,这两个螺旋提供其组氨酸配体;(ii) 由于血红素离子周围低介电常数导致其溶剂化能损失,从而估计细胞色素Em为 +0.31至 +0.37 V。已知当类囊体膜暴露于蛋白酶或损伤处理时,该细胞色素会发生较大的-δEm位移,这是由于中等极性(ein)表面介电层的破坏以及由此导致的血红素与外部水介质接触所致。将该模型应用于细胞色素bc1复合物细胞色素b的两个血红素(bn和bp),两个血红素对称地置于低介电(em)膜双层中,结果血红素bn和bp的Em值分别有些太负(约 -0.1 V)和太正(约 +0.3 V),导致电位差Em(bp) - Em(bn)的符号和大小错误为 +0.25 V,而不是 -0.10至 -0.15 V。如果假设两个血红素处于不同的介电环境,其中血红素bp的环境更具极性,则血红素电位只能大致与实验结果相符。