Ben-Amar A, Cardash H S, Liberman R
Section of Operative Dentistry, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Am J Dent. 1993 Apr;6(2):65-8.
Various techniques for applying two types of varnish to control microleakage of Class V amalgam restorations were compared in vitro. The drying time for each layer of varnish with a gentle air spray was varied, including delays in applying the second coat and the placement of the amalgam restoration. Microleakage was recorded by dye penetration. Both varnishes were inefficient at reducing dye penetration at the gingival wall. There were no statistical differences in dye penetration at the gingival wall between the two varnishes, regardless of the method of application, or the presence of varnish. Both varnishes exhibited good sealing properties at the occlusal wall when used according to the manufacturer's instructions, but varnish application was technique-sensitive. Short-cuts in the procedure may increase leakage; too short a drying time of either varnish can cause microleakage similar to the control group without a varnish.
在体外比较了应用两种类型的清漆来控制V类汞合金修复体微渗漏的各种技术。使用轻柔的空气喷雾时,每层清漆的干燥时间有所不同,包括涂第二层清漆的延迟以及汞合金修复体的放置。通过染料渗透记录微渗漏情况。两种清漆在减少牙龈壁处的染料渗透方面效率都不高。无论应用方法或是否存在清漆,两种清漆在牙龈壁处的染料渗透没有统计学差异。按照制造商的说明使用时,两种清漆在咬合壁处均表现出良好的密封性能,但清漆的应用对技术敏感。操作过程中的捷径可能会增加渗漏;任何一种清漆干燥时间过短都会导致类似于未使用清漆的对照组的微渗漏。