• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气粉抛光后的修复体表面粗糙度

Restoration surface roughness after air-powder polishing.

作者信息

Gutmann M S, Marker V A, Gutmann J L

机构信息

Department of Restorative Sciences, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 1993 Apr;6(2):99-102.

PMID:8397993
Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the surface effects of the air-powder polisher on direct restorative materials in vivo. Hybrid composite, microfilled composite, amalgam, and glass ionomer restorations were polished for 10 seconds. Replicas of the pre-treatment and post-treatment surfaces were examined in the SEM. A visual and written rating scale was developed to evaluate surface roughness, i.e., 1 = smoothest and 7 = roughest. Micrographs (x200) of the pre- and post-treatment surfaces were evaluated as (1) randomly ordered samples and (2) paired samples. The pre-treatment ratings from the randomly ordered samples ranged from 1-7 for the microfilled and hybrid composite, and 3-7 for the glass ionomer restorations. The range of post-treatment ratings was slightly higher for the hybrid and amalgam (2-7) and the glass ionomer (4-7). Results were analyzed by the Wilcoxon ranks test, which showed that the differences between the ratings of pre and post-treatment surfaces were not significant (P < or = 0.05). A comparison between the two evaluation methods using the Spearman rank correlation (Rho) test showed a good correlation (P < or = 0.05) between the random versus paired evaluation methods and suggested that the random rating method was reliable. Thus, a 10-second exposure with the air-powder polisher does not significantly roughen the surface of the materials tested. Visual observations showed that surface changes were dependent on initial conditions, with smooth surfaces becoming rougher, and surfaces that were extremely rough generally becoming smoother.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本研究旨在评估空气喷砂抛光机在体内对直接修复材料的表面影响。对混合复合树脂、微填料复合树脂、银汞合金和玻璃离子修复体进行10秒的抛光处理。在扫描电子显微镜下检查处理前和处理后表面的复制品。制定了视觉和书面评分量表来评估表面粗糙度,即1表示最光滑,7表示最粗糙。将处理前和处理后表面的显微照片(放大200倍)作为(1)随机排序样本和(2)配对样本进行评估。随机排序样本的处理前评分,微填料和混合复合树脂为1 - 7,玻璃离子修复体为3 - 7。混合复合树脂和银汞合金以及玻璃离子修复体处理后的评分范围略高,分别为2 - 7和4 - 7。结果通过威尔科克森秩和检验进行分析,结果表明处理前和处理后表面评分之间的差异不显著(P≤0.05)。使用斯皮尔曼等级相关(Rho)检验对两种评估方法进行比较,结果表明随机评估方法与配对评估方法之间具有良好的相关性(P≤0.05),这表明随机评分方法是可靠的。因此,用空气喷砂抛光机处理10秒不会使所测试材料的表面显著变粗糙。视觉观察表明,表面变化取决于初始条件,光滑表面会变得更粗糙,而极其粗糙的表面通常会变得更光滑。(摘要截短为250字)

相似文献

1
Restoration surface roughness after air-powder polishing.气粉抛光后的修复体表面粗糙度
Am J Dent. 1993 Apr;6(2):99-102.
2
An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.不同空气抛光粉对牙釉质及选定的美学修复材料影响的体外比较。
J Clin Dent. 2014;25(4):76-87.
3
The effect of air polishing on contemporary esthetic restorative materials.空气抛光对当代美学修复材料的影响。
Gen Dent. 2002 May-Jun;50(3):238-41.
4
The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.三种修整系统对四种美学修复材料的影响。
Oper Dent. 1998 Jan-Feb;23(1):36-42.
5
Surface characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials - an SEM study.美学修复材料的表面特征——扫描电子显微镜研究
J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Jan;34(1):68-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01608.x.
6
Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.光固化玻璃离子水门汀修复材料修整后的表面粗糙度
Oper Dent. 1996 May-Jun;21(3):103-9.
7
Contouring, finishing, and polishing Class 5 restorative materials.修整、精整和抛光Ⅴ类修复材料。
Oper Dent. 1997 Jan-Feb;22(1):30-6.
8
Polishing occlusal surfaces of direct Class II composite restorations in vivo.体内直接Ⅱ类复合树脂修复体咬合面的抛光
Oper Dent. 2005 Mar-Apr;30(2):139-46.
9
The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.一步抛光系统对三种美学树脂复合材料表面粗糙度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2004 Mar-Apr;29(2):203-11.
10
Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.预防性抛光方案对美学修复材料表面粗糙度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2002 Jan-Feb;27(1):50-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of glycine pretreatment on the shear bond strength of a CAD/CAM resin nano ceramic material to dentin.甘氨酸预处理对CAD/CAM树脂纳米陶瓷材料与牙本质之间剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2016 Apr 1;8(2):e146-52. doi: 10.4317/jced.52630. eCollection 2016 Apr.
2
Effects of air-polishing powders on color stability of composite resins.空气喷砂抛光粉对复合树脂颜色稳定性的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Oct;19(5):505-10. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011005000021. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
3
The influence of air polishers on tooth enamel. An in-vitro study.
空气磨光机对牙釉质的影响。一项体外研究。
J Orofac Orthop. 1998;59(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/BF01321551.