Yentis S M, Campbell F A, Lerman J
Department of Anaesthesia, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Can J Anaesth. 1993 Jul;40(7):632-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03009700.
To determine the publication rate of abstracts as peer-reviewed manuscripts during the five years subsequent to their presentation, the rates of publication of abstracts that were presented at meetings of four anaesthesia societies (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), International Anesthesia Research Society (IARS), Anaesthesia Research Society (ARS) and Canadian Anaesthetists' Society (CAS), in 1985 were determined. Abstracts (total = 215) from each of the four meetings were selected (ASA n = 114/573 total, IARS n = 39/119, ARS n = 33/99 and CAS n = 29/58) and their appearances in the literature as peer-reviewed manuscripts were determined using MEDLINE for the years 1985 to 1990 under the surname of the presenting author. The contents of the abstracts were compared with those of the resultant manuscripts. The proportions of abstracts from each of the four societies that were published as manuscripts were compared. We found that the mean proportion of abstracts from all four societies that were published as manuscripts within three years of presentation was 44% and within five years 50%. The proportions of abstracts that were published as manuscripts from the four societies were similar. Of the abstracts that were published as manuscripts, 13% from the ASA, 16% from the IARS, 16% from the ARS and 0% from the CAS were published four or five years after abstract presentation. Although the overall proportion of abstracts that was published within five years of presentation did not differ from the rate of publication within three years, we recommend that a uniform policy with respect to the time interval for citation of abstracts be adopted for all anaesthesia journals.
为确定摘要在发表后五年内作为同行评审手稿的发表率,我们测定了1985年在四个麻醉学会(美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)、国际麻醉研究学会(IARS)、麻醉研究学会(ARS)和加拿大麻醉师协会(CAS))会议上发表的摘要的发表率。从这四次会议中分别选取了摘要(总数 = 215篇)(ASA:总数573篇中选114篇,IARS:119篇中选39篇,ARS:99篇中选33篇,CAS:58篇中选29篇),并通过1985年至1990年在MEDLINE中根据第一作者姓氏来确定这些摘要在文献中作为同行评审手稿的出现情况。将摘要内容与最终手稿的内容进行比较。比较了四个学会的摘要作为手稿发表的比例。我们发现,所有四个学会的摘要在发表后三年内作为手稿发表的平均比例为44%,五年内为50%。四个学会的摘要作为手稿发表的比例相似。在作为手稿发表的摘要中,ASA的13%、IARS的16%、ARS的16%以及CAS的0%是在摘要发表四年或五年后发表的。尽管发表后五年内发表的摘要总体比例与三年内的发表率没有差异,但我们建议所有麻醉学杂志采用关于摘要引用时间间隔的统一政策。