Suppr超能文献

社会经济因素与心血管疾病:文献综述

Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature.

作者信息

Kaplan G A, Keil J E

机构信息

Office of Scientific Affairs, American Heart Association, Dallas, TX 75231-4596.

出版信息

Circulation. 1993 Oct;88(4 Pt 1):1973-98. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.4.1973.

Abstract

Despite recent declines in mortality, cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in the United States today. It appears that many of the major risk factors for coronary disease have been identified. Researchers are still learning about different modifiable factors that may influence cardiovascular diseases. Socioeconomic status may provide a new focus. The principal measures of SES have been education, occupation, and income or combinations of these. Education has been the most frequent measure because it does not usually change (as occupation or income might) after young adulthood, information about education can be obtained easily, and it is unlikely that poor health in adulthood influences level of education. However, other measures of SES have merit, and the most informative strategy would incorporate multiple indicators of SES. A variety of psychosocial measures--for example, certain aspects of occupational status--may be important mediators of SES and disease. The hypothesis that high job strain may adversely affect health status has a rational basis and is supported by evidence from a limited number of studies. There is a considerable body of evidence for a relation between socioeconomic factors and all-cause mortality. These findings have been replicated repeatedly for 80 years across measures of socioeconomic level and in geographically diverse populations. During 40 years of study there has been a consistent inverse relation between cardiovascular disease, primarily coronary heart disease, and many of the indicators of SES. Evidence for this relation has been derived from prevalence, prospective, and retrospective cohort studies. Of particular importance to the hypothesis that SES is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease was the finding by several investigators that the patterns of association of SES with coronary disease had changed in men during the past 30 to 40 years and that SES has been associated with the decline of coronary mortality since the mid-1960s. However, the declines in coronary mortality of the last few decades have not affected all segments of society equally. There is some evidence that areas with the poorest socioenvironmental conditions experience later onset in the decline in cardiovascular mortality. A number of studies suggest that poor living conditions in childhood and adolescence contribute to increased risk of arteriosclerosis. Some of these studies have been criticized because of their nature, and others for inadequate control of confounding factors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

尽管近期死亡率有所下降,但心血管疾病仍是当今美国的主要死因。似乎冠心病的许多主要危险因素已被识别。研究人员仍在了解可能影响心血管疾病的不同可改变因素。社会经济地位可能提供一个新的关注点。社会经济地位的主要衡量指标是教育程度、职业和收入或这些因素的组合。教育程度是最常用的衡量指标,因为它在成年早期之后通常不会改变(不像职业或收入那样),关于教育程度的信息很容易获得,而且成年后的健康状况不佳不太可能影响教育水平。然而,社会经济地位的其他衡量指标也有其优点,最具信息量的策略将纳入社会经济地位的多个指标。各种心理社会指标——例如职业地位的某些方面——可能是社会经济地位与疾病之间的重要中介因素。高工作压力可能对健康状况产生不利影响这一假设具有合理依据,并得到了少数研究证据的支持。有大量证据表明社会经济因素与全因死亡率之间存在关联。在80年的时间里,这些发现在不同的社会经济水平衡量指标以及不同地理位置的人群中都得到了反复验证。在40年的研究中,心血管疾病(主要是冠心病)与许多社会经济地位指标之间一直存在着反向关系。这种关系的证据来自患病率研究、前瞻性队列研究和回顾性队列研究。几位研究人员的发现对社会经济地位是心血管疾病危险因素这一假设尤为重要,即过去30至40年里男性中社会经济地位与冠心病的关联模式发生了变化,并且自20世纪60年代中期以来社会经济地位与冠心病死亡率的下降有关。然而,过去几十年冠心病死亡率的下降并非对社会各阶层产生同等影响。有证据表明,社会环境条件最差的地区心血管死亡率下降的起始时间较晚。一些研究表明,儿童期和青少年期的不良生活条件会增加患动脉硬化的风险。其中一些研究因其性质受到批评,另一些则因对混杂因素控制不足而受到批评。(摘要截取自400字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验