• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于法律、医疗事故及过失概念的历史观点。

Historical perspectives on law, medical malpractice, and the concept of negligence.

作者信息

Wood C L

机构信息

Corporate Counsel, Oklahoma Health Care Corporation, Oklahoma City.

出版信息

Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1993 Nov;11(4):819-32.

PMID:8404569
Abstract

Since the dawn of human history, the inherent morbidity and mortality of human beings has made the diagnosis and treatment of human disease a high-risk profession. The ancient risk of physical retribution against the physician has been replaced by the modern risk of economic indemnity or compensation. Monetary settlements and awards are at times so huge that they may result in personal bankruptcy and professional disgrace. This article should not discourage health care providers from continuing their pursuits, but encourage them to enhance their knowledge about how and why medical malpractice has developed. It has been intended to facilitate the "prudent practitioner" with a more thorough understanding of some of the elements of negligence that have caused concerns in the past and will certainly create new concerns as science continues to drag the law in its wake.

摘要

自人类历史开端以来,人类固有的发病率和死亡率使得人类疾病的诊断和治疗成为一项高风险职业。古代针对医生的身体报复风险已被现代的经济赔偿风险所取代。金钱结算和赔偿有时数额巨大,可能导致个人破产和职业声誉受损。本文并非要阻碍医疗服务提供者继续他们的追求,而是鼓励他们增进对医疗事故如何以及为何发展的认识。其目的在于帮助“审慎的从业者”更全面地理解一些过去引发关注、且随着科学不断发展必然会引发新关注的过失要素。

相似文献

1
Historical perspectives on law, medical malpractice, and the concept of negligence.关于法律、医疗事故及过失概念的历史观点。
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1993 Nov;11(4):819-32.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
[Medical history studies on the problem of medical malpractice and medical liability. A 19th century medical law regulating medical liability questions].[关于医疗事故和医疗责任问题的病史研究。一部规范医疗责任问题的19世纪医学法律]
Gesnerus. 1986;43(1-2):61-83.
4
Medical malpractice. An historical perspective.医疗事故。历史视角。
N J Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;100(7-8):21-5.
5
Medicine and the law.医学与法律。
MD. 1979 Jan;23(1):71-83.
6
Understanding tort law: the historic basis of medical-legal liability.理解侵权法:医疗法律责任的历史基础。
J Leg Med (N Y). 1977 Oct;5(10):50-3.
7
[Forensic evaluation of medical malpractice from the historical viewpoint].从历史视角看医疗事故的法医学评估
Zentralbl Chir. 1986;111(9):543-8.
8
[Perspectives in medical liability].[医疗责任视角]
Rev Med Chil. 2008 Apr;136(4):539-43. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
9
Victim or accomplice? Crime, medical malpractice, and the construction of the aborting woman in American case law, 1860s-1970.受害者还是同谋?犯罪、医疗事故以及美国判例法中堕胎女性的形象塑造,19世纪60年代至1970年
Columbia J Gend Law. 2001;10(2):311-32.
10
Congressional study of liability for medical malpractice.国会对医疗事故责任的研究。
N J Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;100(7-8):7.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical malpractice: the effect of doctor-patient relations on medical patient perceptions and malpractice intentions.医疗事故:医患关系对医疗患者认知及医疗事故意图的影响。
West J Med. 2000 Oct;173(4):244-50. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.173.4.244.
2
The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and the National Practitioner Data Bank: the controversy over practitioner privacy versus public access.1986年《医疗保健质量改进法案》与国家从业者数据库:从业者隐私与公众获取信息之间的争议。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996 Apr;84(2):263-9.