Suppr超能文献

一项关于哮喘患者生活质量问卷作为衡量成年哮喘患者病情变化指标的评估。

An evaluation of an asthma quality of life questionnaire as a measure of change in adults with asthma.

作者信息

Marks G B, Dunn S M, Woolcock A J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Oct;46(10):1103-11. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90109-e.

Abstract

In assessing the effectiveness of management strategies for patients with asthma, it is important to measure outcomes which are relevant to the concerns of patients. Quality of life is one such outcome which may not be adequately reflected in lung function measurements. We have developed an asthma quality of life questionnaire (the AQLQ) for this purpose. The aim of this study was to test the validity and responsiveness of the AQLQ as a measure of change. Forty four adults with asthma were assessed on two occasions 4 months apart. On each occasion subjects completed the AQLQ and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). Lung function and the degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) were measured and diary cards were used to derive a symptom score and mean daily peak flow variability. The relation of change in AQLQ scores to change in the other outcomes was assessed. Questionnaire responsiveness was assessed by comparing the change in AQLQ scores between 19 improved and 20 stable subjects. Improvement was assessed on lung function and BHR criteria. As expected, change in AQLQ score was correlated with change in symptom score (r = 0.37, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.64) and change in BHR (r = 0.38, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.64). The associations with change in peak flow variability (r = 0.12, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.47) and change in SIP score (r = 0.18, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.45) were in the expected direction but weaker than expected. The AQLQ was capable of detecting differences between improved and stable subjects (p = 0.007).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在评估哮喘患者管理策略的有效性时,衡量与患者所关注问题相关的结果非常重要。生活质量就是这样一种结果,它可能无法在肺功能测量中得到充分体现。我们为此开发了一份哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ)。本研究的目的是测试AQLQ作为变化衡量指标的有效性和反应性。44名成年哮喘患者在相隔4个月的两个时间点接受评估。每次评估时,受试者都要完成AQLQ和疾病影响量表(SIP)。测量肺功能和支气管高反应性(BHR)程度,并使用日记卡得出症状评分和每日平均呼气峰流速变异性。评估AQLQ评分变化与其他结果变化之间的关系。通过比较19名病情改善患者和20名病情稳定患者的AQLQ评分变化来评估问卷的反应性。根据肺功能和BHR标准评估改善情况。正如预期的那样,AQLQ评分变化与症状评分变化(r = 0.37,95%CI -0.04至0.64)以及BHR变化(r = 0.38,95%CI 0.06至0.64)相关。与呼气峰流速变异性变化(r = 0.12,95%CI -0.26至0.47)和SIP评分变化(r = 0.18,95%CI -0.12至0.45)的关联虽在预期方向,但比预期的弱。AQLQ能够检测出改善患者和稳定患者之间的差异(p = 0.007)。(摘要截选至250词)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验