Division of Public Health and Primary Care, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Aug 20;10:97. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-97.
This study explored the psychometric properties (internal consistency, construct validity, discriminative ability) of the Juniper Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini AQLQ-J) and the Sydney Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ-S).
One hundred fourty-six adults (18-45 years) with asthma requiring regular inhaled corticosteroids were recruited to a trial of written emotional disclosure. Correlational analyses were performed to understand the relationship of the two measures with each other, with symptoms, lung function, asthma control, asthma bother and generic quality of life. Median quality of life scores were compared according to gender, health care usage and levels of asthma severity.
AQLQ-J and AQLQ-S total scores correlated strongly with each other (rho = -0.80) and moderately with the EuroQol Current Health Status Scale (AQLQ-J: rho = 0.35; AQLQ-S: rho = -0.40). Domain score correlations between AQLQ-J and AQLQ-S were mostly moderate (0.50 < rho < 0.80).Both QoL measures were significantly correlated with symptom score. Correlations with the symptom score asthma module (AQLQ-J: rho = -0.69; AQLQ-S: rho = 0.50) were stronger compared with the total symptom score and the symptom score rhinitis module (AQLQ-J: rho = -0.41; AQLQ-S: rho =0.31).Neither QoL measure was significantly correlated with FEV1, % predicted at the total or the domain level.Total scores of both measures were significantly correlated with subjective asthma control (AQLQ-J: rho = 0.68; AQLQ-S: rho = -0.61) and asthma bother (AQLQ-J: rho = -0.73; AQLQ-M: rho = 0.73).Total AQLQ-J score and total AQLQ-S score were significantly associated with perceived asthma severity (AQLQ-J: p=0.004, AQLQ-S: p=0.002) and having visited a GP in the past four months (AQLQ-J: p=0.003, AQLQ-S: p=0.002).
This study provides further evidence for the validity of the AQLQ-J and the AQLQ-S in a British population of adult patients with asthma managed in primary care. Correlations with lung function parameters were weak or absent. Correlations with generic quality of life were moderate, those with asthma symptoms, asthma control and asthma bother were strong. Both measures are able to discriminate between levels of asthma severity and health care usage.
本研究旨在探讨 Juniper 迷你哮喘生活质量问卷(Mini AQLQ-J)和悉尼哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ-S)的心理测量学特性(内部一致性、结构效度、区分能力)。
招募了 146 名年龄在 18-45 岁之间、需要定期吸入皮质类固醇治疗的哮喘成人患者,参加书面情感披露试验。通过相关分析来了解这两种测量方法之间的相互关系,以及它们与症状、肺功能、哮喘控制、哮喘困扰和一般生活质量之间的关系。根据性别、医疗保健使用情况和哮喘严重程度水平,比较了两种问卷的中位数生活质量评分。
AQLQ-J 和 AQLQ-S 的总分之间存在很强的相关性(rho=-0.80),与 EuroQol 当前健康状况量表(AQLQ-J:rho=0.35;AQLQ-S:rho=-0.40)也存在中度相关性。AQLQ-J 和 AQLQ-S 之间的领域得分相关性大多为中度(0.50<rho<0.80)。两种生活质量测量方法均与症状评分显著相关。与哮喘症状模块的评分相关性(AQLQ-J:rho=-0.69;AQLQ-S:rho=0.50)强于总症状评分和鼻炎症状模块(AQLQ-J:rho=-0.41;AQLQ-S:rho=0.31)。两种生活质量测量方法均与 FEV1 无显著相关性,与总或领域水平的预测值也无相关性。两种测量方法的总分均与主观哮喘控制(AQLQ-J:rho=0.68;AQLQ-S:rho=-0.61)和哮喘困扰(AQLQ-J:rho=-0.73;AQLQ-S:rho=-0.73)显著相关。AQLQ-J 的总分和 AQLQ-S 的总分与感知的哮喘严重程度显著相关(AQLQ-J:p=0.004,AQLQ-S:p=0.002),与过去四个月内就诊过全科医生的情况显著相关(AQLQ-J:p=0.003,AQLQ-S:p=0.002)。
本研究进一步证明了 AQLQ-J 和 AQLQ-S 在英国初级保健管理的成年哮喘患者中的有效性。与肺功能参数的相关性较弱或不存在。与一般生活质量的相关性为中度,与哮喘症状、哮喘控制和哮喘困扰的相关性较强。两种方法都能区分哮喘严重程度和医疗保健使用水平。