Suppr超能文献

静脉注射哌替啶用于产科镇痛。

Intravenous meperidine infusion for obstetric analgesia.

作者信息

Isenor L, Penny-MacGillivray T

机构信息

Obstetrics Department, St. Martha's Regional Hospital, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1993 Jul-Aug;22(4):349-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1993.tb01815.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide safe, satisfying obstetric analgesia when epidural analgesia was unavailable.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled study of women in labor.

SETTING

A regional hospital offering primary- and secondary-level obstetric care.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-nine women with low-risk, single, term pregnancies and anticipated vaginal delivery.

INTERVENTIONS

Women in the intermittent intramuscular (IM) injection group received meperidine 50-100 mg, every 2 hours, as required. Those in the intravenous (IV) infusion group received an initial bolus of meperidine 25 mg, a basal infusion rate of 60 mg/h, and intermittent boluses of 25 mg/h as required. Each participant had a maximum of 200 mg of meperidine available to her during labor.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Pain intensity was measured on a 10-cm visual analogue scale. Pain ratings were recorded when analgesia was initiated and every 30 minutes thereafter, until delivery.

RESULTS

Women who received IV meperidine reported significantly lower levels of pain (p = .0015) than women in the IM group. However, women in the IV group received significantly higher doses of meperidine (mean = 121 mg) than those in the IM group (mean = 82 mg; p = .0007). When pain scores were compared on a smaller group of participants (n = 18) who received similar doses of meperidine (100-150 mg), women in the IV group still reported lower pain scores (p = .0092). No significant differences were found between the groups in length of labor, maternal vital signs, fetal heart rate, Apgar scores, level of maternal sedation, or patient-reported side effects.

CONCLUSION

IV meperidine infusion was superior to intermittent IM injections for pain relief during labor.

摘要

目的

在无法实施硬膜外镇痛时,提供安全、令人满意的产科镇痛。

设计

对分娩妇女进行的随机对照研究。

地点

一家提供初级和二级产科护理的地区医院。

参与者

39名低风险、单胎、足月妊娠且预计经阴道分娩的妇女。

干预措施

间歇性肌内注射(IM)组的妇女根据需要每2小时接受50 - 100毫克哌替啶注射。静脉输注(IV)组的妇女先静脉推注25毫克哌替啶,基础输注速率为60毫克/小时,并根据需要间歇性推注25毫克/小时。每位参与者在分娩期间最多可使用200毫克哌替啶。

主要结局指标

采用10厘米视觉模拟量表测量疼痛强度。在开始镇痛时及之后每30分钟记录一次疼痛评分,直至分娩。

结果

接受静脉注射哌替啶的妇女报告的疼痛程度明显低于IM组妇女(p = 0.0015)。然而,IV组妇女接受的哌替啶剂量明显高于IM组(平均 = 121毫克),而IM组平均为82毫克(p = 0.0007)。在接受相似剂量哌替啶(100 - 150毫克)的较小参与者群体(n = 18)中比较疼痛评分时,IV组妇女报告的疼痛评分仍较低(p = 0.0092)。两组在产程长度、产妇生命体征、胎儿心率、阿氏评分、产妇镇静程度或患者报告的副作用方面均未发现显著差异。

结论

静脉输注哌替啶在分娩期间缓解疼痛方面优于间歇性肌内注射。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验