Harrison C J, Chartrand S A, Pichichero M E
Department of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Cincinnati, OH.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993 Jan;12(1):62-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199301000-00014.
In this randomized, investigator-blinded multicenter study, tympanocentesis for acute otitis media with effusion in 137 ears from 108 children, 6 months to 12 years of age, revealed 84 definite pathogens and 32 potential pathogens. Twenty-nine aspirates from 23 subjects were sterile. Of the 116 isolates 42 (36%) were Streptococcus pneumoniae, 24 (21%) were Haemophilus influenzae, 9 (8%) were Moraxella catarrhalis, 9 (8%) were Streptococcus pyogenes and 1 (1%) was Staphylococcus aureus. Twenty-two (19%) definite pathogens produced beta-lactamase. Patients were randomized to cefixime (8 mg/kg/day daily) or cefaclor (40 mg/kg/day divided into two doses). Efficacy was determined by pneumatic otoscopy and tympanometry at the end of therapy visit on Days 11 to 14 and up to 4 weeks of follow-up. At end of therapy subjects with definite pathogens exhibited a satisfactory clinical outcome in 26 of 36 (72%) ears for cefaclor and 40 of 48 (83%) ears for cefixime recipients (P = 0.12). For ears with beta-lactamase-producing isolates there were no (0 to 12) cefixime failures but 4 of 10 cefaclor failures (P = 0.03). Diarrhea/loose stools were more frequent in cefixime (16 of 58) than cefaclor (4 of 50) recipients. One cefixime subject required discontinuation of drug. Overall efficacy for treatment of acute otitis media with effusion was not different; however, cefixime appeared more effective for infections caused by beta-lactamase-producing organisms.
在这项随机、研究者设盲的多中心研究中,对108名6个月至12岁儿童的137只耳朵进行鼓膜穿刺术以治疗急性分泌性中耳炎,结果发现84种明确的病原体和32种潜在病原体。23名受试者的29份吸出物无菌。在116株分离菌中,42株(36%)为肺炎链球菌,24株(21%)为流感嗜血杆菌,9株(8%)为卡他莫拉菌,9株(8%)为化脓性链球菌,1株(1%)为金黄色葡萄球菌。22株(19%)明确的病原体产生β-内酰胺酶。患者被随机分为头孢克肟组(每日8mg/kg)或头孢克洛组(每日40mg/kg,分两次给药)。在治疗第11至14天的治疗访视结束时以及长达4周的随访期,通过鼓气耳镜检查和鼓室导抗图测定疗效。治疗结束时,对于明确病原体感染的耳朵,头孢克洛组36只耳朵中有26只(72%)临床结局令人满意,头孢克肟组48只耳朵中有40只(83%)临床结局令人满意(P = 0.12)。对于分离出产生β-内酰胺酶菌株的耳朵,头孢克肟组无失败病例(0至12例),而头孢克洛组10例中有4例失败(P = 0.03)。头孢克肟组(58例中有16例)腹泻/稀便比头孢克洛组(50例中有4例)更常见。1名头孢克肟组受试者需要停药。治疗急性分泌性中耳炎的总体疗效无差异;然而,头孢克肟对由产生β-内酰胺酶的生物体引起的感染似乎更有效。