Bloom B S, Hillman A L, Fendrick A M, Schwartz J S
School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Feb 15;118(4):298-306. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-4-199302150-00009.
To determine clinical and economic consequences of alternative vaccination strategies for preventing hepatitis B virus infection (HBV).
Decision analysis was used to evaluate costs, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of three HBV management strategies ("no vaccination," "universal vaccination," and "screen and vaccinate") in four populations (newborns, 10-year-old adolescents, a high-risk adult population, and the general adult U.S. population). Information on HBV incidence and prevalence, clinical course, and management of acute illness and chronic sequelae was obtained from the literature and a panel of experts. Actual payments (costs) were obtained from Blue Cross/Blue Shield and local pharmacies. Incremental cost-effectiveness was calculated from the perspective of the payer of medical care and subjected to sensitivity analysis.
Vaccination (with or without screening) prevents more disease at somewhat increased cost than no vaccination for the neonatal, adolescent, and adult populations. Vaccination (with or without screening) is a dominant strategy in adult high-risk populations (lower cost and greater benefit than no vaccination). Optimal cost-effectiveness, with nonmonetary benefits not discounted, results if all pregnant women are screened for active HBV infection, and HBV vaccine and hepatitis B immune globulin are administered to babies born to mothers with positive screening tests. Then HBV vaccine is administered to all children at age 10 and again 10 years later (incremental cost-per-year-of-life-saved relative to the "no vaccination" strategy is $375). A strategy of universal newborn vaccination alone leads to an incremental cost-per-year-of-life saved of $3332. If adolescents are vaccinated at age 10, incremental cost-per-year-of-life saved is $13,938; for the general adult population, the incremental cost-per-year-of-life saved of universal vaccination is $54,524. Discounting benefits will increase cost-per-year-of-life saved 7 to 12 times for all strategies.
HBV vaccine is most cost-effective when a strategy of screening newborns is combined with routine administration to 10-year-old children. The means to achieve substantial improvements in the health of the public in a cost-effective fashion are now available and should be pursued aggressively.
确定预防乙型肝炎病毒感染(HBV)的替代疫苗接种策略的临床和经济后果。
采用决策分析评估四种人群(新生儿、10岁青少年、高危成年人群和美国成年普通人群)中三种HBV管理策略(“不接种疫苗”、“普遍接种疫苗”和“筛查并接种疫苗”)的成本、结果和成本效益。关于HBV发病率和患病率、临床病程以及急性疾病和慢性后遗症管理的信息来自文献和专家小组。实际支付费用(成本)来自蓝十字/蓝盾保险公司和当地药房。从医疗保健支付方的角度计算增量成本效益,并进行敏感性分析。
对于新生儿、青少年和成年人群,接种疫苗(无论是否进行筛查)在成本略有增加的情况下比不接种疫苗预防的疾病更多。在成年高危人群中,接种疫苗(无论是否进行筛查)是一种占优策略(成本低于不接种疫苗且效益更高)。如果对所有孕妇进行活动性HBV感染筛查,并对筛查试验呈阳性的母亲所生婴儿接种HBV疫苗和乙型肝炎免疫球蛋白,然后对所有10岁儿童接种HBV疫苗,并在10年后再次接种(相对于“不接种疫苗”策略,每年挽救生命的增量成本为375美元),则在不考虑非货币效益贴现的情况下可实现最佳成本效益。仅普遍接种新生儿疫苗的策略导致每年挽救生命的增量成本为3332美元。如果青少年在10岁时接种疫苗,每年挽救生命的增量成本为13938美元;对于成年普通人群,普遍接种疫苗每年挽救生命的增量成本为54524美元。对效益进行贴现将使所有策略每年挽救生命的成本增加7至12倍。
当将筛查新生儿的策略与对10岁儿童进行常规接种相结合时,HBV疫苗具有最高的成本效益。现在已有以具有成本效益的方式大幅改善公众健康的方法,应积极推行。